×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dearman

Dearman

RE: Dearman

The only problem I see with liquid gas systems including LNG, is that if the material is stored in a Dewar, you have to use it or lose it.
It could be a major PITA to come out to your car, after not driving it for a couple of weeks to find the fuel tank empty.
B.E.

The good engineer does not need to memorize every formula; he just needs to know where he can find them when he needs them. Old professor

RE: Dearman

(OP)
If you find his WWW site and read it, he compares LN with other methods of storing energy (produced elsewhere, of course). But the H&S issues in the vid are hilarious.

- Steve

RE: Dearman

From everything I can see there is no engine here. This is a compressed gas motor. It works. It is a "steam motor" if you call Nitrogen gas "liquid Nitrogen steam". Note that the expansion cylinder of a water steam engine is the motor part. The "engine" includes that plus the furnace and boiler. This is my opinion of how those terms should be used, but there is no strict convention, AFAIK.

In this case, the Nitrogen in liquid form is stored mechanical energy like any other compressed gas except that in liquid form it is not under pressure. The pressure is generated as it boils. The recapture of the energy it took to liquify it is probably not achieved with decent efficiency. Also as mentioned, LN2 at atmospheric pressure, like this, boils off continuously.
Nice back yard project. Not an interesting idea, IMHO.

RE: Dearman

(OP)
The guy doesn't claim it to be anything more than an air (steam?) engine.

I just loved the heath-robinson approach. Why-oh-why did I let 'er indoors beat me into scrapping our shed and replacing it with an unused greenhouse?

I also liked his thinking about improving the thermodynamic efficiency with all that working fluids and heat exchanger stuff. Might need to watch it a few more times and do some analysis.

- Steve

RE: Dearman

Smart go at it; his heat exchangers help to reduce the icing issues. While at the U of Wash. (Seattle), my old advisor (and several slave laborers grad students) worked up a Grumman mail jeep converted to use LN2. They found that the price of LN2 is driven solely by the demand for liquid oxygen (mostly medical, but also some industrial uses); LN2 is a byproduct that is grossly underutilized. Thus, it can be quite economical to run such a vehicle, though the range is pretty limited...and yes, the minor H&S issues.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources