Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Steel1040 (Civil/Environmental) (OP)
5 Nov 12 18:51
This may be more of a question for the lab guys, but we were discussing how to properly quantify the organic content in silts and clays. Per ASTM D2487-06, the sample must have a second oven dried sample for testing of the Atterberg Limits. My question is, if you oven-dry the second sample at 110 degrees Celcius, how are you supposed to treat the first sample? Do you ove-dry it at a lower oven temperature or do you run it as is right of the bag, no sieving or drying. I have compared both the ASTM D4318 - 10 to the ASTM D2487-06 and haven't really noticed a difference. Any help would be great. Thanks in Advance
fattdad (Geotechnical)
5 Nov 12 21:57
You only use the oven-dried method for the liquid limit test. You have to get it through the No. 40. I'm pretty sure you can air-dry the sample - just not oven dry it. If there is no plus 40, just take the sample from the bag for your first go at the liquid limit (I'd also do the plastic limit). Oven dry as much as you need for the sieve.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!

reyv (Civil/Environmental)
12 Nov 12 17:52
An interesting note about the Atterberg limits is that Holtz and Kovacs both do not recommend the use of the ASTM method (which requires air-dried samples for limits test) because they produce inconsistent results for some types of soils. They recommend performing the Atterberg limits test at the natural moisture content.

Rey Villa, MS, PE
http://geotech-apps.com

molerat2210 (Geotechnical)
14 Nov 12 15:59
What is the meaning of performing an LL test at natural moisture content? The purpose of the test is the determine the moisture content defining the boundary of plasitc and liquid soil behaviors.

The cited procedure (ASTM D 4318) does not determine the organic content. The ratio of air dry to oven dry liquid limit is merely for soil classification purposed (OL, OH, CL, CH, etc.). The is an organic content test if you are interested in the organic "content". ASTM D 2487 is only a soil classification procedure are not a test procedure.
fattdad (Geotechnical)
14 Nov 12 16:32
Running the liquid limit at the natural moisture content is clearly an oversimplification, but I understood the intent. ASTM allows taking the soil and hydrating it for LL testing without first air drying the sample.

I'd rather use the ASTM method for organic soil classification than the organic content test. I recognize the value of both; however.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!

reyv (Civil/Environmental)
3 Dec 12 11:19
molerat2210 you misunderstood the point. You run the Atterberg test first with out air drying.

Rey Villa, MS, PE
http://geotech-apps.com

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close