×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

duct shape vs. flow resistance

duct shape vs. flow resistance

duct shape vs. flow resistance

(OP)
I have a design in work that requires air purge (0.5 psig) be routed thru an area that requires a short portion of the duct to act as a load carrying structure. Air enters thru round 3 inch dia duct and after traveling about 8 inches and making two 90 deg turns in my piece of structural duct, it exits into another 3 inch dia duct. I tried to maximize the cross section thru my duct / box which has an irregular shape thinking it would offer lower overall resistance. One of my coworkers believes that it would be better to make the internal passage with smooth continuous surfaces even if that requires reducing the cross section area by a substantial amount, as much as 50% in some areas. Which way should I go to minimize flow resistance?

RE: duct shape vs. flow resistance

As a general rule smooth fittings are better. This is particularly true of the inside of the bend. However, increasing the flow area makes a significant difference as well.

As an example compare a smooth bend with r/D of 2 with a single weld 90 degree mitered bend. The smooth bend would have a resistance coefficient (K-value) of about 0.25 but the mitered bend would have a K-value of about 1.1. If the fittings were of the same diameter the pressure drop through the mitered bend would be 4 times that through the smooth bend.

The pressure drop through a fitting is proportional to the velocity squared, so if your cross sectional area increases by 50% the pressure drop would decrease by 1.52 (=2.25), bringing the difference between the smooth and square bends down from 4 to 4/2.25 (= 1.8). So your structural fitting may have a pressure drop of 80% more than 2 smooth 3" bends. Only you can say whether this would be important in the actual job you are doing, but I would guess this small increase in absolute terms over just one section is unlikely to be important.

Katmar Software - Uconeer 3.0
http://katmarsoftware.com

"An undefined problem has an infinite number of solutions"

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources