×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Crack control in flexural members

Crack control in flexural members

Crack control in flexural members

(OP)
I am designing a retaining wall and wondering whether I should apply the crack control section 10.6.4 of ACI318? Although it says for "beams and slabs", shouldn't these be applicable to retaining walls also? Is crack control a serviceability concern or strength concern?

RE: Crack control in flexural members

Crack control is a serviceability concern. The amount of crack control reinforcement required depends on the in service environment of the building element.

RE: Crack control in flexural members

Chapter 14 directs you back to chapter 10 for flexure in retaining walls with governing provisions of 14.3.3 for horizontal reinforcing. If you don't use huge bars in the stem, I would suspect that you aren't going to have an issue meeting this criteria. The spacing of bars required to meet flexure will probably be less than the max shown.

RE: Crack control in flexural members

(OP)
"Crack control is a serviceability concern. The amount of crack control reinforcement required depends on the in service environment of the building element."

Isn't serviceability more of a concern with retaining wall since crack at the back of retaining wall will allow water to penetrate through to rebar? So why don't ACI318 make it necessary to apply to retaining wall also?

RE: Crack control in flexural members

You would think so, but in all my reading, I can't remember a concrete retaining wall failing due to corrosion. They slide or rotate, but for some reason they hold up structurally. Maybe some fail, but they don't get a journal article.
I suspect it's a combination of conservative soil loads plus conservative design.

RE: Crack control in flexural members

It's probably also because the environment is actually often good for concrete: relatively stable, high moisture content against the back surface, reducing shrinkage and cracks. Unless there are deleterious substances in the backfill, it's just the ticket.

RE: Crack control in flexural members

Vertical cracks in retaining walls are common, usually occurring at about 10' or 12' intervals. This is due to restraint by the footing. More horizontal reinforcement controls the width, but not the number, of these cracks. Ground water which leaks through these cracks will often lead to autogeneous healing. If water staining on the face is a problem, a membrane applied to the rear face is the solution.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources