×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

(OP)
When attempting to validate IEC 60909 L-G fault calculations from ETAP, I find that the fault levels are higher than I calculated. It appears that ETAP is doing

Sqrt(3) c U / |2*Z1 + Z0|,

with Z0 taken directly from the R0 and X0 in the cable library entry, rather than using Z0 = Z0 phase cable + 3*Z0 neutral cable. Is this how ETAP calculates the zero sequence impedance? This made me unsure whether the zero sequence impedance information included in the cable datasheet I have includes the neutral conductor or not. Any help is appreciated.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

I don't have ETAP, but I am not sure what you describe there makes sense.

Zero sequence for cables is usually a single figure for the combination (Phase and Neutral). You don't really add it up the way you have described. The equation you show would have been used to determine the library figure for Ro. For Xo it is a bit more complex than just arithmetic addition. Zo for cables may also include the return path through "dirt".

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

Sorry, to clarify, the Z0 = Z0 phase cable + 3*Z0 equation is just not right. You don't ever get total Z0 by adding up component Z0 items (which don't exist in practice) like you have.

I don't have the standard on me know, but I think you mean R0 = Rphase + 3*Rneutral...there may be a divide it all be 3 in there too smile

As I said X0 is harder to calculate.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

(OP)
My understanding was that for a single line to ground fault

If = 3*V / (Z1 + Z2 + Z0 + 3*Zn)

With V the phase line to neutral voltage, Z1, Z2, Z0 the sequence impedances of a phase line, and Zn the zero sequence impedance of the neutral conductor. I guess what I am after is how does the zero sequence resistance and reactance from a cable data sheet relate to the zero sequence impedance in the L-G fault equation.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

That equation looks correct for a ph-grnd fault.

As mentioned by others, Z1, Z2 and Z0 are the sequence impedances for the complete conductor group (i.e. phase conductors and any neutral conductor present).

Zn is the impedance of the fault itself (i.e. 0 for a bolted fault). It has nothing to do with the conductors.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

The zero sequence impedance of cables is not straightforward. In addition to the neutral conductor, if there is one, there is also possibly the cable sheath and another parallel path through the conduit, earth, etc.

The old Westinghouse T&D book has a pretty good section on this. ETAP should be able to explain their methodology and what their Z0 represents.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

(OP)
dpc, when you say ETAP should be able to explain their methodology and what their Z0 represents where do you think I can get this information? I sent an email to ETAP's help desk, but they have not responded.

Also redfurry, I believe Zn includes the zero sequence impedance of the return path, which includes the fault impedance, and the neutral/protective earth line.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

redfurry is correct. Z0 includes the impedance of the return path. Zn (actually it would be more correct to use the symbol Zf) is the impedance of the fault.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

(OP)
However, doesn't the 3*Zn come about, because the zero sequence currents are in phase, and all travelling on the return path (so the algebraic trick is to change 3*In*Zn to In*(3*Zn))?

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

No, Zn disappears into the equivalent circuit Z0. Zf, as pointed out by jghrist, is the impedance of the fault. Zn, back when it had a separate existence, was in parallel with the cable Z0 and so the presence of a neutral Zn would reduce the overall Z0.

It's been standard procedure for a very long time to evaluate an actual physical circuit, including all quantifiable ground paths, and create an equivalent that can be represented by, and is mathematically interchangeable with, a three conductor equivalent. That equivalent is probably what ETAP (which I've never used) is looking for and thinks it is using.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

You could call them. I'm sure someone at ETAP can explain their methodology. I don't use ETAP, so it is pointless for me to speculate. You could try changing some of the circuit parameters (neutral conductor, shielding, ground wire, etc) and see how this changes the Z0 that the program comes up with.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

tmorstyn - by definition Z0 = Z1 + 3ZE where ZE is the impedance of the return path which as mentioned before could be a single conductor of various parallel paths.Zn is not the impedance of the neutral conductor. The latter is contained within Z0 as by the definition above.

Others have correctly pointed out that "Zn" represents the fault impedance and should more appropriately be labelled something like ZF.

Also, and most important Z0 for a cable is quite variable depending on the cable itself as well as the method of installation. Even something simple like earthing the sheath one end or at both ends will affect the value of Z0. I do not often find manufacturers specifying Z0 and my guess is for the reason mentioned above. If they do, they should hopefully clearly stipulate the method of installation.

and yes, calculating Z0 is not easy. For this reason it is preferable to standardise on method of installation resulting in standard Z0 values.

RE: ETAP Cable Zero Sequence Impedance for L-G faults

I am new user in ETAP software. I hope I can learn any information about ETAP in this forum.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources