×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

(OP)
Since Response Spectrum Analysis is a linear analysis, it is unable to account for the tension only Braces in a braced bay.

What is the best way the model tension only braces while performing RSA?
I am trying to model my braces with a 0.5 stiffness modifier, so that the brace bay would act as if it was a tension only brace bay in RSA. Is the method generally valid? or would I get completely erroneous results?

Another thing that I notice is that RSA only show Maximum axial forces in elements. This is leading me to think that RSA theory doesn't distinguish between positive and negative force? Is there any way of finding compression forces?

Any advice would be much appreciated!

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

Stanchan -

It is not possible to run an RSA analysis with tension only or compression only elements. So, if you have an X brace type configuration (or any configuration where there is an equal / symmetric arrangement of braces) then it makes sense to use a 0.5 multiplier on the axial stiffness of the brace. That should work pretty well.

When you get your analysis results the axial forces in the braces are equally likely to be tension or compression.... you don't know. So, in an X brace configuration you would add them together. The total sum is the maximum axial force in the tension brace. That works great if your assumption is that the movent of the structure is almost entirely lateral.

Note: I'm not a SAP guy at all (I actually work for a SAP competitor). But, I can't imagine that this basic concept would be different between programs.

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

RSA is by definition a frequency domain linear analysis, so nonlinear boundary conditions cannot be considered. If you wanted to go beyond your .5 multiplier approximation, you would need to analyze as a NL modal time history analysis using Ritz vectors (or NL Direct Integration). A NL time history analysis would consider tension/compression limits in the dynamic analysis (you can apply TH functions to acceleration loads or other assigned load patterns) and also provide + - directional output results

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

A trick for the case of X bracing is to assign an axial force modifier equal to 0.5 to ALL braces and assume that both tension and compression member are active for horizontal loads. In this way, you "linearize" the problem and a linear response spectrum analysis is allowed. The global behaviour of the structure will be as the whole tensile brace worked and the compressive did not carry any force.

Regards.

Analysis and Design of arbitrary cross sections
Reinforcement design to all major codes
Moment Curvature analysis

http://www.engissol.com/cross-section-analysis-des...

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

(OP)
Thank you so much for all your advice!!! Problem solved!

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

I think it is important to remember, in case you that are using a 0.5 factor, that forces in members to which the braces are connected might then be incorrect.

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

bkal, for sure, but you will be able to perform a response spectrum analysis. Then you should multiply the axial force of the braces by 2.
Which one is easier: A multiplication by 2 or a Non-Linear Time History Analysis? wavey

Analysis and Design of arbitrary cross sections
Reinforcement design to all major codes
Moment Curvature analysis

http://www.engissol.com/cross-section-analysis-des...

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

Johnbridge,

I was not advocating use of N/L analysis; it was just a reminder. Also, use of 0.5 factor will affect not only the bracing members, but also the force in the members connected to the braces.

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

There is another approach. You can only leave one diagonal of the X-bracing and design only for the tension force. In that way you will have correct values for the members that are connected to the diagonal (column base, footing, etc.).
To design the column and its base on the other side of the bracing, you can make a second model with mirrored diagonals.

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

But, since the quake load is taken as positive and negative in relevant seismic combination, compression will 99% occur in this case as well!

Analysis and Design of arbitrary cross sections
Reinforcement design to all major codes
Moment Curvature analysis

http://www.engissol.com/cross-section-analysis-des...

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

Yes and only the tension force must be taken into account, as the compression member is assumed to be buckled.

RE: Tension only member and Response Spectrum Analysis

In Response Spectrum Analysis, since the earthquake is applied as + and - , tension will also occur in this case. You can try it.

Analysis and Design of arbitrary cross sections
Reinforcement design to all major codes
Moment Curvature analysis

http://www.engissol.com/cross-section-analysis-des...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources