INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Carrying a Radial and Axial Load

Carrying a Radial and Axial Load

(OP)
Hi All,

I have an application where I am hinging a heavy door and to trying to minimize the hinge friction. I started a thread in Mech Eng Design (http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=331769) but it seems my question may be more appropriate for this thread. I apologize for the cross post!

My basic question is this: When carrying an axial load and radial load is it better to use two different bearings - one thrust and one radial - or is better to use something like a taper roller or angular contact ball bearing? What are the criteria used in making this determination? This previous thread (http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=286868) only somewhat addressed this question.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!

Best,
Steris

RE: Carrying a Radial and Axial Load

3
The usual primary driver is cost.

In your case, I would first look at a tapered roller bearing at one end of the hinge to carry all of the door's weight and half of the moment, and a straight roller bearing to carry the other half of the moment.

ISTR you are also trying to meet a rather tight spec for operating torque. For that, you have to look at the precision class of the bearings, and think of the allowable runout of the bearing elements as being like a ramp that must be climbed by the rolling element. For this exercise, think of the rolling elements as being unwrappped from their actual cylindrical relations onto a plane, so you are then looking at an inclined plane problem. Since no timing limitation was imposed, the inertia of the door is irrelevant to meeting the spec.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Carrying a Radial and Axial Load

(OP)
Hi Mike,

Thank you so much for your reply!

RE: Carrying a Radial and Axial Load

Steris, you also need to consider two other factors: size and design.

If you were two seperate the functions of a tapered bearing into two seperate bearings, you are taking up much more room, also the cost will most likely be greater.

In terms of design with a tapered bearing, there will be compromises in terms of the loads the bearing can carry. I.E. the thrust is so great that now you have over sized the bearing for the radial loads and now the equipment is overdesigned. by splitting the bearings into components you can design correctly and ccordingly provided you have the money and the space.

RE: Carrying a Radial and Axial Load

A little factor to keep in mind is that a deep groove ball bearing can carry up to half of its radial rating in the axial direction. Often very useful for some bearing applications.

Regards

Neil

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close