×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Load Tests vs. "Below the Hook" BTH-1 design

Load Tests vs. "Below the Hook" BTH-1 design

Load Tests vs. "Below the Hook" BTH-1 design

(OP)
The IBC has requirements in Chapter 17 on structural load tests which apply to structures where the capacity is unknown and difficult or impossible to verify by calculations.

In those sections they typically require a load to be applied to a structure in excess of the design load. The IBC, in section 1713, requires a load of 2 times the design load to be used.
This then is essentially a safety factor of 2.0.

In the ASME BTH-1 document, for say a hanging assembly to lift materials up to a higher level during construction, the BTH requirements for design use higher safety factors
than typical...say 3.0.

The question: If you are trying to verify the safety of an assembly that is already built, and you perform your BTH calculations and think you have a handle on the capacity, but the owner and you think a load test would be helpful, would the load test use a 2.0 safety factor to create the actual load used in the test? Or would you use the 3.0 factor? Or would you use something higher?

If you view the typical 2.0 factor in the IBC as an increase on the typical safety factor of 1.66 used in design, then the IBC is essentially suggesting that loads used in load tests are 2.0 / 1.66 = 1.2 more than typical.

1.2 times the BTH factor of 3.0 leaves you with 3.6 to be used in the load test to verify a BTH designed assembly.

What would be appropriate? The BTH-1 document doesn't appear to speak to in-situ load tests for verification of capacity.

RE: Load Tests vs. "Below the Hook" BTH-1 design

I'm not sure I understand the question. If it's a part of a building, it follows the building code. If it's a below-the-hook lifting device, it follows ASME B30.20, which references ASME BTH. (ASME B30.20 says a proof test "should" be made with 125% of the design load.)

RE: Load Tests vs. "Below the Hook" BTH-1 design

(OP)
I know that this wouldn't fall under the IBC - just using IBC's load test concept to understand how a hanging assembly might be load tested since BTH-1 didn't have any guidance on that.

RE: Load Tests vs. "Below the Hook" BTH-1 design

BTH is the design guide, but ASME B30.20 is the standard for the devices- refer to it for proof testing, marking, etc.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources