×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Standard Substitutions Procedures

Standard Substitutions Procedures

Standard Substitutions Procedures

(OP)
I'm working on an international project which will require the structural steel fabricator to make member size
substitutions due to use of metric sizes or material availability.
Is anyone aware of an industry standard that outlines the procedures for making such substitutions?
I can write my own specs. for substitution and submittal for approval. I'm just checking if there is a published
industry standard.

thank you.

RE: Standard Substitutions Procedures

Require the same grade material as you used in the design.

Also, for the new shape, the flange thickness, the area, section modulus and moment of inertia of the new section should equal or exceed those of the original section.

For beams and purlins, the maximum unbraced length of the section for the moment seen must equal or exceed that of the original section.

For connections, if the width of the new flange, or thickness of the web, is less than the original, all affected connections must be checked.

For concrete footings, the footprint of the new column must equal or exceed that of the original column.

Make the steel fabricator responsible for providing you with calculations verifying that the above restrictions have been satisfied.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Standard Substitutions Procedures

Good afternoon humaneng,
For international projects, if at all possible, it's best to design using the local materials and shapes from the start and avoid the conversions and substitutions at the end. While it's possible to swap out gravity members with stronger/stiffer shapes it can be a little problematic if you have done capacity designs for frame sections and connections.

If it's not practical to design for the actual members (I've had projects too where every beam and column was "built" in a shop out of three separate plates), you may still want to consider specifying no substitutions on the frame elements. Otherwise you will be needing a much more comprehensive spreadsheet for what section properties and material strengths will be permissible.

regards,
Michel

RE: Standard Substitutions Procedures

I am working on a project in Canada with a similar issue. We are using all ISO metric steel as per our client's spec. In some cases our fabricators have substituted in ANSI imperial equivalents. From what I understand the lengths on these members are quite close. We are having issues with some structures that have longer members. I suspect that it is due to tolerance ranges being different from ISO vs ANSI vs MSS.

Is anyone aware of a resource for comparing tolerance levels on different structural members?

RE: Standard Substitutions Procedures

Where is your project? I have done a few projects in the middle east over the last few years....and some of it was a nightmare. NOTHING I specified was available (and I tried to specify what I was told would be available in the local market). I would require them to submit alternate shapes and consider on a case-by-case basis. If your project is like mine was, writing specs for procedures would be a waste of time, because they probably won't follow that either...and you'll still have to consider what ever they can find.

Regarding getting engineered calcs to back up alternates (and I'm speaking only from my limited experience), that too would be a waste of time. I tried that route many times, and finding local engineers was next to impossible for my client (a design/build contractor), and I had to re-engineer based on availability. If your client was like mine and pays for the additional work, it is not the worst thing. But I hate reworking designs either way.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources