×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MicroWeld Stainless Tubing

MicroWeld Stainless Tubing

MicroWeld Stainless Tubing

(OP)
Ed, I figure you may know something about this:

I have a sample of duplex 2205SS HX tube that was made by welding and cold drawing. While there has been uniform corrosion, there has also been some preferential corrosion of the weld, which is darker, indicative of an etching effect. The base metal also has an faint etched appearance.

I have questions about what welding process was used and what subsequent heat treatment was done (if any; the online literature is somewhat vague, except to say the long seam weld is autogenous).

BTW this is an application where 316 was previously resistant.

RE: MicroWeld Stainless Tubing

(OP)
I've since discovered the tubes are bright solution annealed after welding.

RE: MicroWeld Stainless Tubing

What was the service environment?

They would have been in-line bright annealed probably.
So no hydrogen on the ID, Ar only. And the distinct risk of light ID surface oxidation.

The welds are autogenous, probably TIG. There may (or may not) have been N in the weld gas.
If not then the welds are low in N, and low in pitting resistance, and may have too much ferrite.

There is also the issue of possible microstructure issues in the welds.
Besides phase imbalance there is a risk of detrimental secondary phases (mostly intermetallics).
There is also a good chance of this material being underannealed and there simply being a lot of residual segregation in the welds.

Even if none of these is the case you may have either intergranular corrosion of a preferential attack of one phase or the other (or the attack of the interface between phases). In any case you would have more pronounced attack in the welds just because of the coarser grain size.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: MicroWeld Stainless Tubing

(OP)
Tube: ¾"OD x 0.047" (actual), weld width = 0.06" (eyeball)

Product: Mostly organics (biodiesel process), but with a small amount of sulfuric acid. Copious amounts of sludgy deposits covering 100% of the tube-side surfaces.

Sulfuric acid is reducing and aggressive to ferritic SSs; is it sensible to think it might preferentially attack ferrite phase in a duplex SS?

The manufacturer's literature recognizes the issue of the higher ferrite of the autogenous weld but focuses more on the dimensional tolerances and good surface finish of this product.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources