×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Uniform Force Method

Uniform Force Method

Uniform Force Method

(OP)
I have a question regarding the Uniform Force Method and how it applies. I have the typical gusset plate-Column-Beam connection as shown in Figure 13-2 of the AISC 13th edition manual, but I have a structural metal deck diaphragm attached to the top of the beam. Does the Uniform Force Method really apply since I am dragging all of the horizontal load into my diaphram through my beam and only the vertical load thru the column? Can the horizontal and vertical components be found simply by using the load from the diagonal brace multiplied by the sin/cos of the angle? If the UFM does still apply and I want to move the working point to the Column-Beam interface, do I just apply an additional moment to the column and beam or does the additional moment need to be resisted by the connection as well?

RE: Uniform Force Method

UFM can apply to your condition. The bracing forces a transferred from the gusset plate into the beam and then through the studs into the composite floor. Or through some other positive connection of the deck to the beam flange. However, UFM is only one option for the design of bracing connections. You can use simple vector analysis (KISS method) as you describe. This must consider any connection eccentricities at the gusset to beam flange and gusset to column flange connection. If you move the work points from the member's neutral axes, then this moment must be considered in the member design.

www.FerrellEngineering.com
Providing fabrication and erection efficient structural design of connections. Consulting services for structural welding and bolting.

RE: Uniform Force Method

The KISS method is totally fine, but you end up with larger moments as connectegr said. I have seen several instances where engineers used the KISS method and didn't account for those moments. Those instances required retrofitting.

Larry Muir's paper "Design of Compact Gusset Plates with the Uniform Force Method" shows several different options to the UFM and provides the free body diagrams for those. It's a good paper and one you should read prior to designing many gussets.

RE: Uniform Force Method

I don't see why the diaphragm should be a consideration in the connection design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources