×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lateral Support to W-Section/Top Flange

Lateral Support to W-Section/Top Flange

Lateral Support to W-Section/Top Flange

(OP)
All,

I would like your input on a project that I’m working on that I’m having a disagreement with one of my co-workers on. I’ve had this debate with others before, and it seems that everyone has a different understanding of what constitutes lateral support to a W section. I’m familiar with Appendix 6 of the AISC Spec, and the paper, "Fundamentals of Beam Bracing," by Joseph A. Yura, but I would like to hear from other structural engineers.

Here is my situation:

I’m designing an addition to an existing industrial building. The roof of this addition will be engineered wood roof trusses with a 4:12 pitch at 16” O.C. On one side of the addition, the trusses will bear on a W18X50 steel beam, which must span 40’ to meet the client’s needs/existing site conditions. I’ve attached a 2X8 sill plate to the top of the W18X50 beam so I can attach the trusses to the beam. I’m using a Simpson HGA10 to connect the truss to the sill plate, along with 4 toe nails. The 2X8 is attached to the steel beam with ½” bolts 2’ O.C., alternating/staggering the bolts on each side of the W section web.

A detail of this connection is attached for reference.

My design assumes that this connection provides lateral support to the W18X50 and its top flange every 2’. The maximum distance (Lc) for bracing a W18X50 without reducing the allowable bending stress is 6.7’. Without a perpendicular member providing support to this beam, the unbraced length would be 40’, and it’s just not practical to design a steel beam with an unbraced length of 40’.

I was taught that for lateral bracing to be effective, it must prevent both twisting and lateral deflection of the member's cross-section at lateral brace points. I think this detail accomplishes that.

I’ve used similar designs in the past based on the assumption that the wooden trusses attached to a sill plate that is attached to a W section provide this support. To calculate the force that this adds to the truss, I’ve calculated 5% of the compressive force in the top flange of the W section and provided it to the truss manufacturer to incorporate into their design.

My coworker thinks that this connection is not adequate to provide support to the W18X50. If I make that assumption and go with an unbraced length of 40’, then I need a W18X130. That 3,200# of extra steel for this one beam.

What do you say, is this connection adequate or not to provide support to this beam?

RE: Lateral Support to W-Section/Top Flange

If the trusses are designed for the lateral load in the bottom chord, and the 1.5" deep nailing depth of the plate is sufficient, then I guess the numbers could work.

The problem I have with the scenario is having a steel beam of that size supported laterally by wood, even though the numbers may show it as OK. Just feels, and quite frankly, looks funny.

Have you considered increasing the unbraced length by adding an inverted channel section over the top flange?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Lateral Support to W-Section/Top Flange

The trusses brace the top chord, so gravity loading is fine. But for wind uplift loading, the bottom flange is unbraced. Also, is there lateral loading from a door or whatever in the opening, or will there likely be at some time in the future?

RE: Lateral Support to W-Section/Top Flange

Agree with hokie. Top flange is braced. Bottom flange is not.

BA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources