×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Column unbraced length

Column unbraced length

Column unbraced length

(OP)
I am analyzing an existing warehouse with columns that are 30' high to the roof. Problem is the columns are made up of 3 different sections. The first 10' of the columns are W8, the second 10' are HSS 8x8 and the last 10' are W8 again. What would be the un-braced length for each 10' section if the only lateral supported is at the roof.

RE: Column unbraced length

This is bizarre.
I didn't think architects designed warehouses.

I guess in a way you are looking at a step-column.

RE: Column unbraced length

Good morning SE80,
I believe in trying the simplest thing first. Would the column satisfy your design requirements if it were only a W8x section? If not as TJ suggest it's a stepped column of some sort. I looked at the "Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures" but the references there where appropriate to reducing columns steps, not smaller-stronger-smaller. There might be something out there on non-prismatic shapes to help you find a direction.

regards,
Michel

RE: Column unbraced length

Just analyze it with the direct analysis method. No issues with separate shapes. Model it with an initial sinewave bow equal to L/500, split it into several segments, reduce the stiffness, run a second order analysis - done.

RE: Column unbraced length

I would think finite difference approach would be a good way to go to determine the K factor for such a thing. Use a 4 pivotal point, then a 7 pivotal point approach, with richardson extrapolation, to get your value. This is also assuming the intermediate column connections are sufficient for the second order loads, most likely needing to be rigid connections.

I'm attaching a paper on finite difference of non-prismatic columns to give an idea, but this case is simpler.

RE: Column unbraced length

Are there any wall girts attached to the column? If so they might provide bracing in their longitudinal direction.

I'd second WillsV's recommendation too.

RE: Column unbraced length

and dont forgot your notional loads

RE: Column unbraced length

I just looked at a similar problem, and if you assume the weakest section for buckling, as pointed out by Michel60, you will be conservative as K would tend to go below 1 (as long as pin-pin is a sufficient assumption).

What WillisV is saying would be appropriate as well. You can check the connection for whatever second order forces from the analysis to make sure they are sufficient as well.

RE: Column unbraced length

I would look at it as a weak axis W8 unless the section modulus is greater than the tube. I think i would be more concerned with how they are stuck together.

RE: Column unbraced length

@Toad - no need for notional loads if you model the deformed shape as I suggested.

RE: Column unbraced length

Willis- ahh yes, good point.

RE: Column unbraced length

What you describe sounds very similar to a stepped column or a tapered column. There is a "hand-calc" method for solving this type of problem called the "Method of Successive Approximations". It's described in the AISC Design Guide 25 for design of web tapered members. And, also in Timoshenko and Gere's Theory of Elastic Stability.

Though I'd have to say that it is probably easier to set up, as WillisV suggests, a computer model and solve it using hte direct analsyis method.

RE: Column unbraced length

(OP)
Thanks everyone for the responses.

Regarding the direct analysis method, can you analyse it in RAM Elements?

RE: Column unbraced length

Are you sure the middle is a hss or have plates been welded to the flange of the W8 to create a box section in the middle. It is an interesting concept to increase the ry locally over the middle third but i guess it has merit because thats where buckling would occur. May need to solve this one by first principles, timoshenko and gere would be the textbook i'd consult too.

RE: Column unbraced length

If you want to get the K-factor for the non-prismatic section I do the following by using FEM program:

I model the column as a hinge roller , roller in the gravity direction (to use K=1 in Euler equation).
I add a load on the top of the column and I run the bucking analysis
I get the Euler bucking load
From the Euler equation I get the RIGHT Inertia of the non-prismatic column

From then I can use the monograph or what ever method to get the K-factor

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources