×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

(OP)
Is there any reason why I shouldn't use a 3 phase miniature circuit breaker rather than fuses on the secondary (110V) side of a VT?

We've always used red spot fuses in the past but have been offered MCBs in the scheme I'm looking at. I can't think of a good reason not to use the MCBs at the moment but I'm sure there must be a reason we haven't done in the past.

RE: Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

It's common to see MCB's used on VT secondaries and I see no reason not too, assuming the performance is acceptable.

RE: Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

(OP)
Thanks Scott, the only problem I can think of is that it would be harder to lock off as a point of isolation. It's good to know it's common elsewhere.

RE: Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

I find MCBs preferable, it gives you an indication on when you've lost your VT connection. Useful for undervoltage/frequency functions, absolutely vital for impedance protection.

I rarely encounter fuses anymore, only when retrofitting some older installations. Although I understand there are fuses with indication contacts as well. Never seen them though.

RE: Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

(OP)
These VTs are for tariff metering and I enable the voltage imbalance alarm on the meter so we get an almost immediate alarm if a phase goes down. MCBs would make fault finding easier.

I like the idea of not having to scrabble around the bottom of my toolbag to find a spare fuse!

RE: Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

We have MCB's on the VT's of our latest switchgear and don't anticipate any problems. They are very handy as there are many MCBs in each compartment and fuse wedges can be easily interchanged mixing up the ratings. If there is an upstream LV fuse locked away in a compartment, make sure the grading is right so on a short-circuit the MCB trips before the fuse.

RE: Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

It costs very little to add an auxiliary contact to the MCB and connect it into the 'protection abnormal' alarm or whatever term you use to describe a non-fatal but undesirable state of the protection scheme. A fuse of the size you find on VT secondaries doesn't really have that option.

RE: Miniature circuit beaker vs fuse in VT secondary wiring

Grasshopper fuses will provide an alarm when they blow, and are the right size/scale for protection and control systems. Although I do agree, MCB's are preferable.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources