Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...These forums are an excellent source and example of the way people can help each other..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
johnhovard23 (Mechanical)
2 Aug 12 2:48
hi every body
in the project I'm following, the hydrostatic test for onshore section is 1.5*98 +10 barg.
according ASME B31.8, the test pressure is 1.5 times OP. why do they add 10 barg? please explain me. thanhk.
BigInch (Petroleum)
2 Aug 12 5:51
It could be simply a client preference, however in your particular case it is especially unfortunate because that puts your 157 barg test pressure higher than the ANSI#600 test pressure allowable (156 Barg) by just 1 bar. Dropping that seemingly arbitrary 10 Bar addition and strictly follow the code reqirement would allow you to use ANSI#600 flanges, whereas now technically you would have to go and upgrade to 900# just to legally reach that bloody 157 Barg test pressure. The +10 Bar seems to be an exceedingly blind-sided requirement in this case. I'd duke it out with the client before I went to 900# class just to make some seemingly arbitrary test pressure. There is no techical justification for it that I can see from here. Ask your client why, then explain to them what I just told you above.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If it's not safe ... make it that way.

zdas04 (Mechanical)
2 Aug 12 7:39
I see a lot of arbitrary nonsense added by clients to test requirements. I've had good luck with going to clients and explaining the problems that their arbitrary and capricious rules cause. I'm with BigInch in his excellent recommendation.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close