×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

I have a Countmeasures Co

I have a Countmeasures Co

I have a Countmeasures Co

(OP)
          I have a Countmeasures Computer power supply whose part number is 1874AS7200 made by Raytheon, its failure rate is 83.36. Raytheon has another proposed power supply whose part number is 1874AS7300 whose failure rate is 93.31.   For the one whose part number is  1874AS7300 Raytheon used the "Brick Technology".
 I need to know :
1) Why the failure rate for this one is almost 10 more than the other one.
2) Which one is better and why.
3) What is I "Brick Technology" and what is the benifit of its use.
 If you have any information please let me know.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Mrinal Saha
SahaM@navair.navy.mil

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources