Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Congratulations on a brilliant idea and a great site..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
sybie99 (Structural)
28 Jul 12 3:15
Hi,

I am a structural engineer with lots of experience in buildings, but have very little to no experience in bridge design. The bridge expert in our company is about to retire and it has been decided that he transfer as much knowledge as he can to myself and inlove me in bridge projects so that in 5 years time I will be a fairly competent bridge engineer. I will have to do lots of self study and of course EngTips will help me considerably in this regard. I will in the next few months be asking what to some are very simple questions as I try to get a basic understanding of bridge design. Please bear with me:

1) Does one have to provide joints if temperature movement is little, say 20mm? Why can one not just provide enough reinforcement to control the crack widths as done in buildings? Is it a durability issue because cracks in bridges would allow water to penetrate? Joints are expensive and create their own problems thus I would think where ever possible one should try to avoid them.

cooperDBM (Structural)
28 Jul 12 11:17
Welcome to bridge engineering. I think you'll enjoy it. With the introduction of computers in design in the 60's and 70's most multi-span bridges became continuous, or semi-continuous, eliminating joints over the piers. In the last 20 years or so bridge engineers have tried to eliminate end joints at the abutments whenever possible through the use of integral, or semi-integral abutments. An integral abutment is designed with sufficient longitudinal flexibility (e.g. a single row of piles) to allow some shrinkage and seasonal movement. A semi-integral abutment uses a horizontal joint at the end to eliminate a gap open to the road surface. As you noted joints don't stay sealed for long and lead to a lot of deterioration, particularly where road salt is used.
bridgebuster (Civil)
28 Jul 12 19:48
If you're referring to a joint over a pier I would go for continuity. Joints at abutments are a different story, usually DOT's - here in the US. I assume you're not because you mention mm's - have there preferences. On a conventional design - non-integral abutments - 20 mm joint can be formed with elastomeric concrete and filled with backer rod and pourable sealant. Here in the northeast US they seem to be working out very well.
MiketheEngineer (Structural)
1 Aug 12 12:21
I would say listen and pay attention!! Seems like you might have 5 years to learn this??? Shouldn't be a problem.

My thoughts have always been that I can learn 90% in a year or less - the rest will take a lifetime.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close