×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

4th Axis Machining Geometry

4th Axis Machining Geometry

4th Axis Machining Geometry

(OP)
Hello all,

I am trying to model a rather complicated part exactly as it should be produced. Imagine an hour glass shaped cylinder that is machined via 4th axis with a sine wave. I can easily make this cut on a surface, but the new surfaces formed are what trouble me. I have tried surface lofts, but I lose the control of the geometry that I need. Basically, what command options do I have to make these new surfaces accurately (accounting for the geometry of the cutting tool)? If I could do a swept cut that somehow stayed perpendicular to my rotational axis, that would be great; but I don't know how to make this happen.

Thanks!
Siress

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Quote:

I am trying to model a rather complicated part exactly as it should be produced.
Why? What sort of magical thing will happen if you succeed within this self-imposed arbitrary constraint?

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

(OP)
Because of reasons.

Good day.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

What you're looking for is not all that unusual. The question is often asked in the form of "can I sweep a solid?", to which the answer is no, but there are work arounds. The people who are asking this question are looking for the same thing you are: to generate a model that acurately represents what happens on the machine.
Try dropping in on this NX thread: http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=326303
If you want some of the sample files converted to step or parasolid let me know.

Ray S
NX 7.0.1.7
www.appliedprecisionproducts.com

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Actually, in SWX2012, you can sweep a solid. Look up "Sweep Property Manager" in the SWX help. I think you might just find what you are looking for.

- - -Updraft

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Hi,

Why do not you post an image and maybe with math definition so that we can better help you?

Best regards,

Alex

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

(OP)
Ray, thank you very much for your help! Sadly, the solution within Solidworks hasn't been posted in the thread you linked. I am unaware of a method that will even allow me to do a surface sweep of the tool path's rotational axis so that I can then thicken the surface.

Updraft, that's very cool, but I'm using SW2011.

Jassco, I may need to do that soon.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

My point is that one should not get hung up on using machining techniques as modeling techniques. Yes, you want accurate geometry. No, you don't necessarily want to play "virtual machinist" to get it done.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Siress, the solid sweep cut goes back to SW2008 or SW2009. I use it quite extensively with SW2010 right now. As Updraft said it has it limitations and it will slow down your file, but it does work. The biggest this is to keep your toolpaths as simple as possible so it may take several features to get it done.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Quote:

My point is that one should not get hung up on using machining techniques as modeling techniques.

There are many instances where swept-solid type (or complicated techniques to replicate this geometry) is the only way to create the digital geometry. This problem posted by the OP sounds like one of these cases. Similar problems have come up on the various MCAD forums over the years.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

(OP)
Rollupswx, thanks for that link. I've exhausted that method prior to making this thread, though. I need more detailed control over the geometry without bogging myself down with the mathematics of a sketch wrapped onto a wavy surface. (as much as I may love Stokes' theorem)

Mncad, I've tried solid sweep cuts before, but it has never resolved a feature for me. I tried it again, following the included help file directions to the letter with defaults applied, and posted the error here. I then tried the method I actually want of keeping the tool body normal to the axis, and solidworks sat busy for 10min before I stopped it. [Note that I frequently model knurling in my parts, and that only takes a few seconds on my machine; it's not a slouch. And please reserve your judgements for applying knurling, it's because of reasons. :)] Perhaps you could direct me to a good example of someone doing what I'm attempting?

Regarding the attached, the part is a revolved spline. The cutting tool path is a 3D spline on the surface of the part (this provides me the actual geometry that I am concerned with detailing, instead of a wrap). The tool body is a simple revolved rectangle, not merged with the part, tangent to the tool path with the rotational axis of the tool body lying on the tool path.

Thank you all for your help!

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Hi, Siress:

It appears that you do not have control over orientation of your cutter.

Best regards,

Alex

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Quote (rollupswx)

There are many instances where swept-solid type (or complicated techniques to replicate this geometry) is the only way to create the digital geometry.
This does not appear to be one of them.

You could do this without sweeping a solid. Draw the path like you did, then make a ruled surface (normal to the solid surface), and then thicken the ruled surface. I've had good luck and sound, workable toolpaths with this technique.

With the swept solid (or "simulated toolpath"), the side surfaces of the cut are determined by the orientation of the tool, and the tool is not necessarily held normal to the cut surface.

Also, it seems a bit of a stretch to force the cut to be made by a single pass of a tool of exact size. Sloppy. With that kind of inaccuracy built into the process, taking the effort to be overly precise is pointless.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

(OP)

Quote (TheTick)

Draw the path like you did, then make a ruled surface (normal to the solid surface), and then thicken the ruled surface.

That actually worked on a simple cylinder, now that I knew how to do it. Thanks, TheTick!

Directions in case this comes up in a google search:

Once you have a tool path, create a line indicating the cutting tool's rotational axis that is incident to the tool path. Go to Surface-Sweep and select the tool axis as the profile and the tool path as the path, under options keep the orientation as Follow Path and change the Path Alignment Type to Direction Vector, then select a surface with an axis of symmetry the same as your part.

However, the same method applied to a wavy surface yielded the attached; which isn't close at all.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

You don't want to make a sweep surface. I'll try breaking it down for you.

  • Copy outer surface (with offset).
  • Draw centerline of path on surface.
  • Use Split Line to cut the surface along the path.
  • Create a surface normal to the copied surface along the split line using Ruled Surface.
  • Thicken the ruled surface to the tool diameter (do not merge, keep as separate solid body).
  • Use Move Face --> Offset to ensure tool path body properly intersects your model.
  • Subtract tool path from main solid.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

(OP)
Awesome! Thank you.

I'm getting a future version error, as I'm using SW2011. I still appreciate the effort.

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Hi, TheTick:

I took a look at the model you created. How do you know that the ruled surface created based on the 3D sketch (on surface spline) is normal to the cylinderical surface?

Best regards,

Alex

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Quote:

How do you know that the ruled surface created based on the 3D sketch (on surface spline) is normal to the cylinderical surface?
That is how the ruled surface is defined. Check the options when creating the ruled surface. (I don't think it can be changed after creating.)

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

Hi, TheTick:

Thanks for the quick reply! My point is that the ruled surface has not knowledge of the cylinderical surface. When you created the ruled surface, you did not pick the surface. You only pick the 3D sketch.

Best regards,

Alex

RE: 4th Axis Machining Geometry

jassco, the edge of the surface was selected, not a 3D sketch. By selecting the egdge, the surface is automatically associated.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources