×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Comparing acoustic data (units question)

Comparing acoustic data (units question)

Comparing acoustic data (units question)

(OP)
I wanted to compare noise levels for a couple different data sets I have seen presented in papers. Each one of the papers seems to plot their noise level spectrum levels using different units:

dB re 1 microPa^2/Hz @ 1m
dB re 1 microPa/sqrt(Hz) @ 1m
dB re 1 microPa/sqrt(Hz) RMS @ 1m
dB re 1 microPa/Hz

How do I convert values presented in PSD (microPa^2/Hz) or spectrum level (microPa/Hz) into source level units (microPa/sqrt(Hz)) so I can make an 'apples to apples comparison?

Thanks

RE: Comparing acoustic data (units question)

There's a fair old muddle

I tried to write a quick answer yesterday and it was worse than useless.

I think 2 and 3 are probably identical.

4 may or may not be comparable in any sense with the others.

case 1 is in power like terms, and will increase as 10*log(p1/p0), whereas the others are in volt like terms, and will increase as 20*log(p1/p0)

My basic approach would be to turn them back into Pa^2, and then try and sort the frequency resolution effect out.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Comparing acoustic data (units question)

Not really an answer but another question...

Why on earth would someone use 1 uPa instead of 20 uPa as a reference (unless it was in some sort of low pressure environment?

M

--
Dr Michael F Platten

RE: Comparing acoustic data (units question)

(OP)
Mike
1 microPa is typically referenced for acoustic measurements in water.

Greg
Can you explain what you mean by 'frequency resolution effect'. I thought that the /hz and /sqrt(hz) notation was used to normalize the data so band width information isn't needed.

RE: Comparing acoustic data (units question)

20 uPa is typically though of as the threshold of human hearing. If human hearing's not involved, any other reference seems valid, so long as it is quoted with the dB measuement.

- Steve

RE: Comparing acoustic data (units question)

That's why I get nervous when people start quoting psd type data. Every calibrator I've used has been a pure sine wave, and most problems I've worked on have been pure tones. I don't want the height of the peak jumping around a lot just because I change frequency resolution. Fair enough, to calibrate we often use the power in a wider band than 1 bin. I'm not saying my usage is right, it is just why I am not going to give you a cookbook answer, I'd have to go through it carefully from first principles.

The first principls of course is that sigma v^2 over a given frequency range should be the same, whatever units you are using.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources