×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

(OP)
Is it a bad idea to connect carbon steel and stainless pipe?


Room temperatures and mainly water.

I saw in a galvanic series chart that the difference in potential is about .4 and obviously the Carbon steel will get sacrificed.
Any coating that I could use between them?

RE: Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

Treated water? Deoxygenated? Then it's likely OK.

Untreated, oxygenated water? Water with high total dissolved solids or low pH? It might be a risk.

Make the connection with galvanic isolation (galvanic unions etc.) if possible and you can take the risk out of it. Just don't connect them through the structure or with a ground wire etc. or you've defeated the usefulness of the galvanic union.

RE: Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

No mention of surface area of the carbon or stainless steel, which is an important variable, so no accurate response can be provided. As with any galvanic couple, surface area of the material behaving as an anode should be larger in comparison to the cathodic material.

RE: Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

Coat the cathode (304) near the junction.

"You see, wire telegraph is like a very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Radio operates the same way: You send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is there is no cat." A. Einstein

RE: Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

Guy's comment is the answer, coat the SS. Coat the threads, the end, and the ID back about 20 time the pipe diameter.

Actually the galvanic series that you saw is in seawater. In water with low conductivity it is less of an issue. With Lake Michigan water you would not need to do anything.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

Lake Michigan water provides a coating?

Just curious...

Dik

RE: Bad idea? Carbon steel and 304 stainless?

No, clean fresh water has such low conductivity that galvanic corrosion is very slow and gradual.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources