×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Nikasil vs Iron Liners

Nikasil vs Iron Liners

Nikasil vs Iron Liners

(OP)
I know Nikasil is great for wear resistance, but is there any advantage, compared to cast iron liners, in cylinder cooling?

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

Nikasil is not a liner material. It is a coating that is normally applied to aluminium, but can be applied to iron also, so the significant influence on heat transfer is the material to which the Nikasil is applied.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

(OP)
Yes, Pat, that is what I had suspected. The Nikasil is not thick enough to have a significant effect on heat transfer. The comparison I am interested in is aluminum air cooled cylinders--Nikasil coated aluminum bore vs iron sleeve pressed into aluminum cylinder.

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

swall,

Nikasil can be applied to iron or aluminum bores. It is used on iron bores because it gives better wear, reduced friction, and improved performance under marginal lubrication conditions. With aluminum bores a more precise fit can be achieved with an aluminum piston, due to similar CTE's.

Whether the bore is air-cooled or liquid-cooled, the thermal conduction across the liner wall thickness is probably more efficient in a monolithic aluminum structure, as opposed to an iron/aluminum composite structure.

However, I'm not brave enough to make unqualified statements backed by a promise to pose naked on the the steps of city hall like patprimmer does. There may be some extreme combination of engine operating pressures/temperatures and structural requirements that works better with the iron/aluminum combination. blush

Regards,
Terry

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

(OP)
I would hope that Pat would at least wait until January when it is warmer. I would hate to see him catch pneumonia

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

That would be doubly bad - Pat getting sick, and the rest of us seeing him naked.

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

Getting back to technical issues, the true baseline for comparison probably should be iron cylinders with as-cast fins.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

MikeHalloran,

That's a good point. But simply comparing dimensionally identical cylinders (one monolithic aluminum, one having an iron liner with finned aluminum sleeve, and one monolithic iron) does give a true picture of the situation. On one hand, aluminum has much better thermal conductivity than iron. But on the other hand, iron has a couple of things in its favor. Iron has a higher MoE than aluminum, it has better strength at elevated temperature, and iron has a much higher allowable operating temperature limit than aluminum (400+degF vs ~275degF). To get an honest comparison, we should compare each cylinder construction after it has been optimized for all operating variables.

Assuming an equally stiff cylinder structure, the iron liner wall can be much thinner than the aluminum liner wall. And if the lube conditions at the bore surface permit, the iron liner can be operated at higher temperatures than the aluminum liner. This would help thermal efficiency by reducing heat transfer from the combustion gas to the liner wall due to a smaller deltaT.

The big recip piston aircraft engines of the late '40s showed that air-cooled steel liners can be made to work quite well while achieving low weight and high reliability.

Interesting discussion.
Terry

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

Back in the air cooled Buell Racing days we always changed production cylinders (Iron lined with cast aluminum fins) to aluminium with Nikasil coating (just cast without the liner). Seemed to help cylinder cooling quite a bit even with the same fin aera between the two designs. Pistons had large skirts so they seemed to benifit a little too. The main cooling issue with these engines was always the head and keeping it from melting and the cylinders had little to no effect on that. Biggest advantage to the Nikasil for our aplication was a huge weight reduction, second biggest advantage was the complete lack of cylinder wear. The cooling was nice but we would have changed just for weigh savings alone.

RE: Nikasil vs Iron Liners

Both types of cylinders suffered some heat distortion as well as distortion form torquing the head down. "Torque Plates" were required on both designs when honing. The total power loss from cold to hot was pretty much the same, in other words both lost equal power once hot. The design life for the engine was 200 miles so we never had enough compression and couldn't turbo per the rules to really push the combustion pressure too high. We never had any Nakasil cylinder failures.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources