×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Nozzle reinforcement at head

Nozzle reinforcement at head

Nozzle reinforcement at head

(OP)
Has anyone ever used head nominal thickness instead of "minimum thickness after forming" for nozzle reinforcement calculation? Assuming the nozzle size is less than 30% of the head diameter so it won't fall in the knuckle area.

This "minimum" thickness is not " code minimum thickness". It is thin out after forming, normally happens in the knuckle area, which is approximate 1/8" less than the nominal thickness.

RE: Nozzle reinforcement at head

I wouldn't recommend this practice, however you could take an actual measurement of thickness and use that.

It is always best to error on the side of conservatism.

RE: Nozzle reinforcement at head

Moreover, you should be careful with assuming that the knuckle region is the one with the highest thinning, depending on the forming process of the head it is also possible that the crown area is the thinnest. Only dished and flanged heads have the thinnest wall in the knuckle region, and this is only a rule with still a few exceptions. I'd propose to follow innovation2's advice and be a bit conservative here.
A thickness measurement might help, but you need to test several areas to have a trustworthy knowledge of the actual thickness in the nozzle area.

RE: Nozzle reinforcement at head

It is a bit tricky question, because the code is not specific on this question. It is implied that you'd use the minimum calculated thickness for reinforcement calculation and the excess is between the minimum calculated thickness and the estimated minimum thickness after forming. The ASME BPVC does not have provision for recalculating the reinforcement after the reception of the heads. By then, your calculations have been reviewed and approved, finalised.
However, I have typically used the plate nominal thickness for the nozzles located in the centre of head, when I have had the confidence the thickness will not be altered. For other locations, there might be a chance of unexpected thinning.
I would say, you judge the location and the risk of thinner wall than expected.
Cheers,
gr2vessels

RE: Nozzle reinforcement at head

You can't use nominal but you can specify two different forming allowances if required. Specify something like not to exceed 5% over the 60% diameter limit and 15% for the remainder. The head manufacturer always does a dimensional check to verify compliance with your order. If they are already made then you probably will need to get the heads re-checked. I have seen the thinnest point vary a lot in dished and flanged ends, it can often be within the 80% diameter limit, therefore this would be a last resort if you can't change the design.

RE: Nozzle reinforcement at head

It is interesting to see comments from experienced people on using nominal head thickness in nozzle reinforcement calculation. The Code rule is to use minimum specified head thickness as the "t" in UG-37 calc. This is the thickness that is to be shown on Form U-1 as the minimum head thickness, not the nominal plate thickness that is to be used to form the head, even if the head thickness at the nozzle location is close to this nominal thickness.

RE: Nozzle reinforcement at head

You are correct jamesl unconditional.
However, the use of nominal thickness in some cases is a common practice outside USA when bending a bit the rule could save significant money, without compromising the safety intent of the code.
Cheers,
gr2vessels

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources