×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wharf Duck

Wharf Duck

Wharf Duck

(OP)
How to determine the psi of existing concrete piles over 40 yrs. ago, Because I'm going to design a RC- Precast slab and RC- beam.

job'

i'm virgilio villacorta bs civil engineering. i'll been work assupervisingengineer on horizontal and vertical project morethan 18 yrs.

RE: Wharf Duck

The psi may be determine via coring and testing the sample.  Alternatively, if you know the design strength of the concrete at the original placement you can use a factor of 1.5 to determine the strength of the aged concrete.  Otherwise you can be conservative and use 1.0.

RE: Wharf Duck

There is a non destructive testing method that may be useful. Its called a Schmidt Hammer. (also called a Swiss hammer). This method of testing is based on the inertia of a ball inside the Schmidt hammer testing apparatus that is "bounced off" of the concrete.

Be careful using this as it only gives the strength near the surface. It is also very susceptible to user errors (not holding correctly, etc.)

The big advantage is that it gives strength readings in seconds. Take lots and use the average.

They can be found on the net. Use your favorite search engine.

Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng

Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com

RE: Wharf Duck

I would not use the Schmidt hammer for this application.  The strength readings provided by this method are highly variable and often incorrect.  This concrete likely has some surface deterioration (carbonation, sulphate attack, etc.), which will make the readings even more suspect.

The Windsor Probe would be a bit better than the Schmidt hammer, but the definitive assessment should be done by coring as you need to know the integrity of the concrete as well as its strength.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources