Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...What a great service! This is the best site I've ever seen!!! It totally restores my faith in humanity when people take time out to help other people..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
bodildra (Materials)
13 Jul 12 7:31
**Previously posted in steel and stainless steel forum**

I am currently working on a bend made from AISI 4130, 75 K and subjected to NACE MR0175 requirements (max 22 HRC). Before induction bending the pipe complied with the requirements, but after bending the pipe had become hard over the whole surface region. This was not detected before after welding the bend to other components, and PWHT.

My question: bending was performed by another company which has the following qualified post pending procedure:
-Hardening @ 870*C
-Oil quench
-Tempering @ 670 *C

For our bend the PBHT was;
-Hardening @ 900*C
-WATER quench
-Tempering @ 670 *C

Can the difference in PBHT explained the high hardness distribution?
Metalguy (Materials)
13 Jul 12 9:37
How thick is the wall. Does NOT sound like your tempering temp. was reached. How hard is it?

"You see, wire telegraph is like a very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Radio operates the same way: You send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is there is no cat." A. Einstein

redpicker (Materials)
13 Jul 12 12:03
It's quite possible that the difference between the oil quench and water quench is the cause.

The water quench can require a higher tempering temperature than was needed with the oil quench.

Re-temper at a higher temperature and see if that will bring the hardness into range. How much higher will depend on how much hardness you need to drop to reach the target harndess. For example, if you need to drop 4 HRC points, you could consider increasing the temperature 20 C.

rp
metengr (Materials)
13 Jul 12 13:20
I would concur with the previous comments. My first thought is the tempering temperature is either too low or not enough time at temperature for tempering.

It looks like tempering at 676 deg C would do it, and have at least 1 hour/inch thickness at temperature.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close