×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Overpressure Protection on Steam Jackets

Overpressure Protection on Steam Jackets

Overpressure Protection on Steam Jackets

(OP)
During recent PHAs, it became clear that we were lacking protection on steam jackets for the scenario of external fire. Several clients have equiped their jackets with PSVs, however, the concern has been raised, that the relief valve may not provide adequate protection for a jacket as there is very little heat transfer from the jacket to the steam, therefore, the presseure is not expected to rise very much. This presents a problem that the jacket may fail very quickly while still under pressure, as the walls of the jacket would heat up and fail. We have determined that the installation of fusible plugs would provide a means of relieving the internal pressure of the jacket before equipment failure due to exsesive wall temeprature.

My questions are as follows:
Does the above make sense? It makes sense to me and other engineers here but I just want to check

Are there other refineries/chemical plants/engineering firms/etc. following this same logic?

Also, has anyone ever heard of or seen a jacket fail (or other vapor filled vessel) fail during an external fire?

Thanks in advance for the help.

RE: Overpressure Protection on Steam Jackets

That makes perfect sense to me. When people consult with me about pressure protection for jacketed equipment exposed to fire, I explain that a fusible plug is about the only way to prevent the jacket from failing. That true whether the jacket has liquid or vapor.

If it contains vapor, then you have the same problem as you have with any other vapor-filled vessel which is exposed to fire. Regardless of size, a PSV won't prevent the vessel from failing during fire exposure unless there's a boiling liquid inside.

If the jacket contains liquid, then you have a classic 2-phase relief application. In most every case the jacket passages are too narrow to allow for liquid-vapor disengagement, meaning that 2-phase relief flow is inevitable. That requires a bigger PSV and you'll usually find that the inlet connection is too large for the jacket. Even if it's not, installing that PSV won't prevent the jacket from failing unless the fire is extinguished in less than ~10-15 minutes. That's because the 2-phase relief will very quickly empty all the liquid from the jacket. When that happens....well, refer to previous paragraph.

So, the only way to save a jacket from failing is to de-pressure it, and the most practical way to do that is with a fusible plug. That doesn't mean you don't need a PSV. You need to install a PSV just for code compliance. If you have other credible relief scenarios, besides fire, then size for the worst of those scenarios. If there are no other scenarios, then you get to pick any size PSV you want. I choose a small one, one with an inlet connection that matches the smallest nozzle allowed on the jacket.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources