×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Glideslope Antenna Reflector Design Change

Glideslope Antenna Reflector Design Change

Glideslope Antenna Reflector Design Change

(OP)
Looking for substantiation to replace a hollow tube antenna reflector element with one made from solid round stock. My background with these models in rusty to non-existent. Anybody know of good reference to come up to speed quickly. These antennas are mounted on NLG, Ground personnel are killing these things with tiedown chains.

Thanks

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; experience suggests that in practice, there is.

RE: Glideslope Antenna Reflector Design Change

Pull the analysis/substantiation for the currently installed equipment. You might find the margins will support the added weight without redesign; if not, you will at least have a starting point.

RE: Glideslope Antenna Reflector Design Change

(OP)
Thanks ncaero,

I wish I had access to the design data. I'm at the operator level looking thinks over after many hands have been in the pie. Looks like replacing them is now a non starter now any way.

They are mounted behind the ILS antennas, all on the nose landing gear. Ground handlers bend them with tie down chains. The current issue is, if the reflector behind the left ILS antenna is bent, does it affect the reception pattern of the RH antenna?

Tendency most casual observers have is to discount it as obviously no. My concern is that the whole assembly is very irregular and you just never know how all the nulls and reflections affect each other.

Absent data, can bending the reflector materially change the receptioon on the antenna all the way to the other side? With no data, for a safety critical system, I think we have to assume yes.



In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; experience suggests that in practice, there is.

RE: Glideslope Antenna Reflector Design Change

As you probably already know, the Glide Slope carrier frequency band is approximately 329 MHz to 335 MHz. At that frequency it is very easy to get squirrely reflections and lobes that can do funny things. However as long as both antennas get the RF carrier without disruption, they both should still be able to decode the 90 Hz and 150 Hz directional signals.

My recommendation would be to have a couple of ground handlers fired to make the others pay attention. Alternatively, make them pay for damaged antennas. But of course both options require them to be caught with the evidence.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources