×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

control joints on monolithic slab foundation

control joints on monolithic slab foundation

control joints on monolithic slab foundation

(OP)
I would like to place control joints along walls so they can be hidden and fit well with ceramic tile joints over them. However,I am concerned whether such control joints would activate because beneath walls of the slab is thick concrete foundation. The below image is a side view cross section of the slab showing the proposed 4 color coded cement truck pours. The 2 construction joints through the slab on either end of the green double as control joints. The plan is the slab is 4" thick, the 2 joints are grooved 1" deep, and no slab rebar will cross the joints though rebar deeper in the foundation will.


RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

I realize your handle is "computer", so let's start with getting the terminology. The truck is a "concrete" truck, not a cement truck. It will deliver concrete, not just cement.

I'm not sure why you are thickening the slab edges when you have a separate footing underneath the edges. Monolithic generally means that the footing and slab are cast integrally, not in separate placements.

To answer your wall question, the weight of the wall will help restrain the slab; however, your control joints should activate long before the walls are up. Control joints are most effective in the high shrinkage time of the first 30 days or so of the slab's curing process.

Timing of the control joint placement along with proper spacing of the control joints will determine more about their success than the wall location. For instance, on a 4" thick slab, the joints should be no more than about 12 feet apart in either direction, should be 1" deep as noted, and should be cut the same day as placement of the concrete...don't wait until the 2nd day...some cracks will have already occured.

With your geometry, you are likely to get restraint cracks at the thickness transition of the slab...that is why I question your placement approach.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

I generally put joints at the edge of the slab thickening, not in the middle as shown. I've not tried that... have to think about it for a bit...

Sawcutting should be undertaken as soon as the saw can cut the concrete without it 'tearing up the surface with the aggregate' (ravelling). This is generally within 6 or 8 hours after finishing... earlier with a sofcut saw. YOu may be sawcutting in the evening/night, if slab is cast in the afternoon.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

(OP)
Thanks guys. I plan to cut the control joints with a hand concrete groover, just after bull floating and when the watery sheen disappears. The edges of the slab are not actually thickened, the picture is just trying to illustrate the first pour brings the footings to 6" below the slab. Even though all 4 pours should be finished in one day making it truly monolithic, the idea is each pour will be performed in a fail safe way such that if there is an unexpected stop such as an equipment failure or bad weather the current pour can end at a suitable construction joint allowing proper continuation the next day.

I will reinforce the slab with heavy enough steel mesh that allows 20' spans between control joints. I prefer this longer span because I can get away with just two control joints that can mostly be hidden below trim boards and since the slab itself is 20' wide it means control joints are only needed in one direction. From what I have read, there will be cracks at this span indeed, but the specification I need to meet is the overall implementation (compaction, concrete quality, reinforcement, vibration, control joints, etc) will limit cracks to 1mm width maximum to prevent termite entry.

So the question in my mind is whether on a monolithic pour a control joint on the slab over a footing will activate properly.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

Heavier reinforcement will not necessarily increase the distance between cracks. In fact, it can actually decrease the distance, though the cracks will generally stay tightly closed. In my opinion, 20-ft spacing on control joints is too much, reinforced or not.

The mix design of the concrete has a lot to do with how wide your cracks will ultimately open. If the water-cement ratio is more than 0.50, the shrinkage will be relatively high, thus opening the cracks more. If you are using small coarse aggregate for pumping expedience, more cement will be required, thus more shrinkage. Keep the water-cement ratio as low as possible and the coarse aggregate as large as practicable to mitigate shrinkage.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

If you use wire mesh, it will not do much good unless it is placed properly.
In almost every construction and demolition job I have seen, the wire mesh is at the bottom of the slab where it does little good.
For this reason, I think wire mesh is a waste of money and do not spec it.
For light use such as sidewalks, residential slabs, and driveways, you don't need wire mesh. Use plastic fiber in the concrete and, most importantly, cut your control joints as Ron says, no more than 12 feet apart. Some will disagree with me on the benefits of plastic fiber, but the control joint placement and timing is critical.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

With a 4" slab, I wouldn't normally go more than 10' or so without a sawcut...

Dik

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

(OP)
I will follow ACI 302.1 guidelines that the mesh will be in the top 1/3rd of the slab to keep surface cracks tight. Likewise the mesh will be placed on precast-concrete bar supports rather than laid on the ground and pulled up by hand during the pour.

Below is the control joint spacing specification I am referring to. 665 mesh is 5.3mm diameter on 6" centers. Since the slab will mostly be covered by ceramic tile, minimizing visible joint lines is preferable, but only so long as the design is sound. Still looking forward to any input on the original question regarding placing control joints over footings. But comments or suggestions on other areas are also welcome.


RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

Pappy64...the table is fine...for perfection...something you're not likely to see. If you don't tighten up the control joint spacing, you'll get cracks you don't want.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

(OP)
My understanding is selecting a suitable mesh for a given span will not eliminate cracks, but it will keep cracks sufficiently tight. I wish to use the slab as a termite barrier and one of the requirements to that end is cracks are no greater than 1mm wide. Is line 1 of the table not going to do achieve that?

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

lay your joints out to match your ceramic tile joints... the table should have spacing based on slab thickness... rebar is added info... if it says you can go 600' max, it doesn't say you should not exceed 10'... For a 4" slab, I'd stick to about 10' max and space your tile to suit the joints, or vice versa...

Dik

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

I don't worry as much about cracks as some other folks, but wouldn't rely on controlling cracks as a termite barrier method. On the other hand, joints would provide free access.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

I agree with hokie, a concrete slab is not effective as a termite barrier. There will always be cracks that provide a pathway for the termites.

In Hawaii, Basaltic Termite Barrier (BTB) is often used. BTB is a material patented by the University of Hawaii and licensed for production and sale to Ameron HC&D. It is graded to very specific graded basalt aggregate product. I don't know if a similar product exists elsewhere. Detailed product information and design guidance using the product can be found at the following sites:

http://www.ameronhawaii.com/plagg.html
http://www.architecturaldiagnostics.com/pdf/BTB%20...

I'm curious, is this product available elsewhere?

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

Hey Hoa...I heard your termites eat the concrete!

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

Ron - I've heard that too, but don't know if it's true and have always assumed a more likely explanation is that they can find their way through even very narrow cracks. I don't know how it's possible, but I don't know how that big rat got in my desk drawer to open and eat my bag of potato chips either.

One thing is for sure, a concrete slab doesn't stop termites. I know of housing development consisting of about 50 homes all built slab on grade. Within about a year after construction was complete, every house in the development that was built on ground where the cut was less than 3 feet deep, and every lot filled with material excavated from the top three feet of material was devoured by termites to the point that the houses had be be demolished. Then the law suits ensued.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

@pappy 64: But we must remember these are Aussie termites. Given the penchant for Fosters and rugged sports, they are probably a bit buff than ones from other countries, eh?

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

I wouldn't count on all the termites being 1.4 mm or bigger. They are clever little devils. Most house slabs are placed without supervision, so I wouldn't depend on the slab alone.

Hoaokapohake, a similar product is used in Australia, called Granitgard. There is also a fine stainless mesh called Termimesh which is used a bit. Both types require meticulous installation and avoidance of damage, which in houses is often an unrealistic expectation.

Maintaining a chemical barrier, avoiding wet areas adjacent to the building, and being vigilant for signs of infestation are the best safeguards.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

Quote (hokie66)

Maintaining a chemical barrier, avoiding wet areas adjacent to the building, and being vigilant for signs of infestation are the best safeguards.

Good advice!

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

I would also say a visual area between the earth and slab helps min 200mm is good to see if termites are active. I would also suport hokies earlier comments in regards to cracks

http://www.nceng.com.au/
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

RE...agree. Here we try to get at least 6" separation, a bit less than your 200mm, but the point about separation is significant. The mud tunnels can be readily observed as it is easier to build a tunnel on the outside face of the foundation than burrow through tight cracks. Another impediment is to put a metal flashing under the wall termination and extend out slightly past the wall surface....they don't build tunnels very well around metal corners !

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

From Pappy's link to "Concrete Slabs as Barriers to Subterranean Termites,"concrete slabs constructed in accordance with AS 2870 are generally expected to have crack widths less than 1 mm." If it is so that slabs constructed according to the standard are "generally expected" to have cracks less than 1 mm, then it is also true that a population of slabs should be "exceptionally expected" to have cracks greater than 1 mm. Who wants to be the designer when exceptions to what is generally true take place and termites ring the dinner bell?

The reality is various strategies have been developed to prevent termite infestation because termites do attack structures where concrete separates the ground and wood. Even if theoretically a concrete slab should stop termites, in practice they don't do it well enough. Perhaps it is because of a gap between what is specified and what is actually constructed, but that happens A LOT! A better method, or redundant methods, are needed.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

P.S. Termites are better slab inspectors than engineers. Being absolutely relentless in their pursuit; they find the concrete deficiency that the engineer missed and then they mark the trail for their buddies to follow to the feast.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

(OP)
It would seem the methodology to obtain a slab that is termite resistant is no different than designing a slab to meet a certain strength requirement. It's just a matter of staying within the margins of proven specifications. If you stay within the margins it works, if you don't then it may not. Today over half of new homes in Australia use the slab as the sole preventative measure against termites. And no wonder, who really wants to use poisons around their houses and the price of a stainless steel mesh barrier can be astronomical.

If you read the study it was interesting that termites actually need cracks significantly wider than their size because they don't go through without surrounding mud tunnels so allowable crack sizes are actually even higher.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

Count me as one who wants to use "poisons around their houses". By the way, I think the stainless mesh only has openings about 0.5 mm. Don't know why a slab with a 1.4 mm crack would be better.

Who told you that over half the new homes in Australia use only the slab?

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

(OP)
> Count me as one who wants to use "poisons around their houses".

Wow, ok.

> I think the stainless mesh only has openings about 0.5 mm. Don't know why a slab with a 1.4 mm crack would be better.

There are several reasons for this. Typically mesh size is designed to be smaller than the head of a termite which is a pretty good specification. However, the space to allow movement of a termite is larger and comes into play over a longer crawl space like a slab which is also abrasive. Specifying concrete to have smaller cracks would simply add cost without benefits.

> Who told you that over half the new homes in Australia use only the slab?

Do a search.

RE: control joints on monolithic slab foundation

Now, fellas, what about roaches??

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources