Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...I wish I knew about this site years ago. It would have saved me a lot of heartaches..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
KurtSauer (Structural)
9 Jul 12 17:20
Anyone know why Autodesk in the 2013 program has decided to change the "ARRAY" command from an extension of the "COPY" command to the creation of a block (or some other single entity) instead of basically resulting in the very familiar multiple copies of a group of objects that we ( or at least, I )was used to seeing in 2011? (I never installed 2012, so maybe this occurred in that version.) Is there an easy "fix" to return to the classic version of the "ARRAY" command as the default (I know the system recognizes this because I ran across it in a "HELP" function, but I can't find a way to get to that point, and haven't had a reply yet from my inquiry to AutoDesk.) Thanks.
mflayler (Mechanical)
10 Jul 12 8:07
Use the command CLASSICARRAY or ARRAYCLASSIC forget which it is, but it will allow you to use the old style version of the command.
MrBachelor (Civil/Environmental)
13 Jul 12 21:23
I noted the different array command in 2012 the other day. While it is different, it seems simple enough to get used to. While it does create a block of the objects instead of leaving them separate as the previous command did, I believe you can simply explode the block created by the array and leave the individual objects.

Thanks mflayler for the tip for the old command. I'll have to compare for future reference.

Nate the Great

www.ceieng.com

KurtSauer (Structural)
16 Jul 12 6:12
Thanks to both for the info. Have edited the drop-down menu (yes, I have the "Classic" interface, also!) to include the Classic ARRAY command. Nate, the EXPLODE command is a good thought for some I've created and editted earlier. Biggest annoyance was in using the new command, the parameters (#rows, cols, spacing) aren't immediately prompted. Was easier to create the array block as default, then edit it.
dik (Structural)
16 Jul 12 13:57
The new array results in a smaller drawing... like the use of blocks... it defines the single array item as an object and then only has to pur it at locations n x m... The old array put the actual array item at n x m locations.

Dik

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close