×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Current test switch burden

Current test switch burden

Current test switch burden

(OP)
Does anyone have any test data for the burden of a FT-1 current test switch? I am trying to do a burden calculation for a CT circuit with 2 relays and 3 FT-1 test switches in the circuit. I am going to use .1 ohm per test switch and that to include the termination contact resistance but don't want to be to low or to high.

Thanks

RE: Current test switch burden

Sounds really high to me. One hundred feet of #10 AWG is about 0.1 ohms. If you have a Low Resistance Ohmmeter, you could put about 50 amps through one and measure it. I'd expect something less than 0.01 ohms. I've never run across anyone who included this in burden calcs, FWIW.





RE: Current test switch burden

I am agree with DPC, the resistance value is negligible. For practical application test switches are ignored.

RE: Current test switch burden

A competitor to ABB FT switch (Secucontrol.com) lists their FT compatible switch having a contact resistance less than or equal to 2 milli ohm.

RE: Current test switch burden

(OP)
I found this article on the burden of test switches indicating the resistance/burden of the FT-1 test switches should be considered. See page 17 of the artictle. If this is true, I don't know why the manufacturers don't put in this information into the specs on their test switches.

It was by secure control
"Test Blocks, Plugs, and Probes – or When
the Dynamo Meets the Integrated Circuit"
David R. Blair
BHP Energy Solutions, Ltd.

http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.secucontrol...

RE: Current test switch burden

I think the author is trying to sell something. Obviously there is some resistance. Smallgreek's reference of .002 ohms seems reasonable to me. Don't forget to add in the resistance of the crimp connectors, and adjust for high ambient temperature on the hottest day the installation will ever experience.

If neglecting this impedance was creating actual problems with CT saturation and burden error, I think the issue would be known and practicing engineers would be including it.



RE: Current test switch burden

It's generally accepted practice to ignore the test switch resistance, as it's almost always dominated by the lead's resistance.

I formerly worked for a company that made test switches and did some informal testing that showed an average of around 1-2 milli-ohms per circuit (meaning 2 test switches) and this included all of the crimp connectors, etc...

RE: Current test switch burden

Couple of mΩ matches my experience with measuring switches and contactors.

Good on ya,

Goober Dave

Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources