Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Just wanted to let you know that I registered today, and your site is fantastic. I found solutions to problems that I have been encountering for months!..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?

Safety: overpressure of vessel leading to its destructionHelpful Member!(2) 

Nanimo (Aerospace)
27 Jun 12 15:41
Hello,

I'm working on a safety report for an experiment I'll be working for. It involve pressure vessel and pipes under pressure that will be heated. For the safety clearance, I need to demonstrate the effect of a "worst case scenario", that would be
1) Overpressure of the pressure vessel (propane tank) leading to it's destruction
2) Overpressure of the pipes (stainless steel and ceramics) leading to its destruction.

I have other worst case scenario but are not relevant to this forum / are already handled.

As I'm quite new to this stuff, I was wondering if you had paper / handbook that could help me to put numbers or demonstrate the effect that would occur in case of these two scenarios? So I can then size the eventual protection system for the experiment.

PS: I mentionned I'm using propane but I'm not interested in the part when propane and air is mixed, that has been handled. It's really the overpressure aftermath that I'm investigating.
stanweld (Materials)
28 Jun 12 12:02
Assuming that the pressure/temperature is such that the liquid propane will flash during rupture, you should treat the test as a pneumatic test and use NASA guidelines to determine the minimum distance at which personnel should be stationed for safety. And if so, why not use air or nitrogen for the test? Furthermore, if you are testing to rupture, why not use water?
Nanimo (Aerospace)
28 Jun 12 12:45
Hi Stanweld,

Thanks for your answer. I've been reading a few things about the subject, and am working with "Workbook for predicting pressure wave and fragments effect of exploding propellant tanks and gas storage vessels". This one seems to have some good things for me.

The purpose of the test is not to go to rupture, but I have to show that in the "worst case scenario" everything has been made to ensure security of personnel.
stanweld (Materials)
28 Jun 12 14:28
The stored energy of a gas containing vessel/closed pipe system is a function of Pressue X Volume. In english units:
E = 360PV{1-(14.7/P)} to the power of 0.286
Presure is in PSI, Volume is in cubic feet.
1 million ft-lbs is approximately = 1/2 lb of TNT.

NASA has developed safe distance equations/curves to be used during pneumatic testing based on the instantaneous release of stored energy, assuming possible rupture at a test pressure. I would advise using it to predict safe distances without additional blast protection measures.
Nanimo (Aerospace)
28 Jun 12 14:33
Do you know the name/link of the paper presenting these equations?

When looking in google, I find lot of different things but nothing that straightforward.
Helpful Member!  stanweld (Materials)
28 Jun 12 17:10
Mark's Mechanical Engineers Handbook
Berkeley Laboratories, Health and Safety Manual - Stored Energy of a Pressurized Gas Vessel.
Helpful Member!  austsa (Mechanical)
30 Jun 12 4:01
Nanimo,
Google NASA Glenn Safety Manual. Contains a lot of info that may be relevant to you. Stanweld has already provided the formula.
Ensure there is no electrical instruments (including mobile phones) close to the vessel. Also suggest that you prevent static charge build up. The NASA formula only takes pressure energy into account. It does not account for propane's chemical energy (in the case of an explosion).
Don't rush into this test without doing your homework thoroughly.
austsa
davefitz (Mechanical)
30 Jun 12 17:35
I am surprised that one would be putting on paper such a predicted failure. It would seem that there are so many availbable means to prevent a "worst case" from happening. A rutpture disc would cost less than the engineering study you are proposing.
vpl (Nuclear)
30 Jun 12 21:19
Has anyone asked if this is a student assignment?

Patricia Lougheed

******

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

Nanimo (Aerospace)
16 Jul 12 12:26
Thanks for the info. I also used "Workbook for predicting pressure wave and fragment effects of exploding propellant tanks and gas storage vessels" (NASA, 1977).

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close