×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Piping Class and Design Pressure

Piping Class and Design Pressure

Piping Class and Design Pressure

(OP)
Hi,
If the design pressure for a piping spec is somewhere between the ASME Class 300 and 600 pressure/temperature ratings can it be labelled a "Class 600" piping spec? Class 600 flanges will be specified in the spec, but the piping wall thickesses will be calculated using the design pressure. I think it is dangerous to label the spec Class 600, but I have seen this happen several times.
Thanks

RE: Piping Class and Design Pressure

Pipe specs can be limited by ANY component, including valves. Most people do design pipe specs to be flange rather than pipe limited for a variety of reasons, but there is no code requirement to do so.

Calling a spec "class 600" when it has a MAWP less than class 600 is potentially confusing- but not necessarily dangerous. In reality, your spec is possibly good for class 600 to a certain diameter or temperature. In that case, is it really wrong to call it class 600? But you could call it by any acronym you want if you fear confusion.

RE: Piping Class and Design Pressure

Confusion is the big risk. If I call out ANSI 600 flanges, I am specifying a configuration of the flange (flange dimensions, number of bolt holes, etc), and a component (not necessarily a system) MAWP. It seems to me that if you call out "Class 600" next to a pipe (which comes in Schedules instead of Classes) then you seem to be implying that the ambient-temperature MAWP will be around 100 Bar(g). If the actual system MAWP is actually 41.3 bar(g) (600 psig) then you really are courting a major screw-up somewhere down the line.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.

RE: Piping Class and Design Pressure

You can do it. Not a problem. It is done all the time by everybody that commonly design to a pipe wall rating, i.e. virtually all pipeline companies, except for zdas & co. smile The MAOP will be specified on the PF/PIDs and alignment sheets, if it is a pipeline job.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If it's not safe ... make it that way.

RE: Piping Class and Design Pressure

Yeah, that is why I don't like the convention of calling class out on the P&ID.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.

RE: Piping Class and Design Pressure

We usually use some arbitray numbering system for piping specs. For example for a system with a 150 psig design pressure, we'll list the piping and fitting, say sometthing like A1, then list out all the applicaple pipe diamters, grade, wall thickness, fitting class, etc. Then, for example, a 900 psig system, we'll name another piping spec B1.

Then special services will have their own specs, say for stainless lube oil piping, etc.

Then all lines on the P&IDs will be labled with something like 10"-A1-XXXX-YYYY, where XXXX is an system designation (with it's own numbering system) and YYYY is the line designation.

There's a gazillion ways to do it, and everyone does it differently.

RE: Piping Class and Design Pressure

That sounds like a clear and unambiguous system

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.

RE: Piping Class and Design Pressure

(OP)
Thanks for the help everyone, I appreciate it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources