×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)
3

Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

(OP)
I am a little unclear about the history of the recommended composite action for composite steel beams. I have heard that 25% is the “new” recommended minimum and that it used to be 50%. I haven’t been around long enough to know the history so if someone can take a few moments and bring me up to speed that would be very helpful.

Also,

1) What are some of the ways to increase the composite action in a beam (silly question I am sure)?
2) Can you use a continuous or cantilevered beam as a composite. I think the anwer is no but I could be wrong.

Thanks.

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

Assuming we are takling about IBC/AISC there is currently no code minimum.

AISC Tables for composite beams go down to 25% and it is therefore the De facto minimum that many people use as well as software vendors.

The AISC Commentary cautions against using less than 50% due to premature departure from elastic behavior and increased ductility demands on the studs, but this is only Commentary.

I have found around 40% to be the sweet spot for economy, which generally works out to be a stud a foot.

1) Read AISC Chapter I. 2) Read the Commentary to AISC Chapter I.

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

I agree with Willis - a stud a foot usually works. Like 99% of the time.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

It is allowed to design a cantilevered beam as a composite section, but the composite action only helps with positive bending. The bare beam still has to take the full negative bending demand (over the support), so it becomes impractical for cantilevers that are long.

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

@Seth - unless you provide rebar in the slab, in which case you can determine a "composite" capacity in negative bending, which is covered in the Commentary, which is why I told him to read it smile

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

It used to be that 50% was minimum for strength and that 25% could be used for deflections...

Dik

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

Quote:

I have found around 40% to be the sweet spot for economy, which generally works out to be a stud a foot.

I know an old-timer who doesn't space shear studs further than 12 inches on center. I wonder if this is what is he going for with that rule.

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

(OP)
WillisV, thank you.

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

(OP)
I guess I have a few more questions:

1) what is the ideal % action that one should try to achieve?
2) Can you get 100% composite action?
3) For girders, supporting 2-3 beams, could you use two rows of studs?

RE: Recommended composite action (25% vs 50%)

WWTEng -

The ideal percentage differs from region to region and from beam to beam. You have to add more studs to get a higher % composite. So, it's a matter of how much steel costs per pound compared to the installed cost of adding studs.

To get to 100% composite action all you need to do is add more studs (usually). And, girders can certainly have multiple studs per deck flute.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources