Scallop for Weight Savings
Scallop for Weight Savings
(OP)
Hi All,
I remember when i was working for Northrop Grumman, the Chief Engineer warned us of using scallops at the joints for weight savings. Essentially, using 2D edge distance and anything beyond should be scalloped if your after weight savings.
I assume it had to do with Fatigue but I don't remember exactly why scalloping is not recommended.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
I remember when i was working for Northrop Grumman, the Chief Engineer warned us of using scallops at the joints for weight savings. Essentially, using 2D edge distance and anything beyond should be scalloped if your after weight savings.
I assume it had to do with Fatigue but I don't remember exactly why scalloping is not recommended.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.





RE: Scallop for Weight Savings
- no allowance for MRB or repair
- more complicated for fatigue analysis; available fatigue data might not be applicable
- what type of structure (application)?
- what material?
- what type of fasteners?
RE: Scallop for Weight Savings
"Bugger all weight advantage for effort expended"
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: Scallop for Weight Savings
several OEMs do what you suggest ... scallop a splice strap. my experience has been attaching secondary structure to primary structure where you want a flexible joint (so that the two sides of the joint can strain at different rates, so that the less stiff side will follow the stiffer side, ...).
my point is whilst i agree with the previous posts (how much are you saving ? how much effort ??), some companies will have long experience with this (and so reluctant not to continue); from an OEM's perspective saving 0.1 lbs (even 0.01 lbs) 1000 times on a plane for the cost of some time on the router (and probably the same time as it'd take to rout a parallel strap) is worth it. BUT be careful ... to do this on a primary splice joint would be to invite trouble.
RE: Scallop for Weight Savings
However I suspect the answer depends very much on details.
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: Scallop for Weight Savings
RE: Scallop for Weight Savings
Scalloping the edge of a frame, stiffener, longeron, doubler etc is NOT the same as fingering the ends of a doubler or skin.
Scalloped edges allow a thicker part to shed some weight while maintaining thickness for fastener bearing. HOWEVER, the problems with scalloping the edge of a any metal part are multi-fold...
Precisely scalloping an edge to a match a fastener pattern not yet installed can be dicy without precision tooling. Scalloping to match a pre-existing fastener pattern is tedious at best.
Now comes the zingers.
A wavy edge cannot carry significant lengthwise tension or compression without significant increases in peek-to-valley stress concentrations... or compression buckles concentrating at wave valleys.
Transverse bearing-tear-out occurs on a 40 degree angles from hole center [classic Bruhn]. Scalloped edges reduce tearout strength by reducing the hole-edge-to-free-edge distance.
Wavy edges are significantly longer than a straight edge (duhhhh). However cracks tend to form at edges; so the longer the edge, the greater the potential for cracks
Regards, Wil Taylor
Trust - But Verify!
We believe to be true what we prefer to be true.
For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible.