Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Dudes! Great site. You've saved me hours and hours...and I have just started using your site. I've already passed your URL onto my entire company. Keep up the awesome work. Bingo-bango..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
johang (Petroleum)
5 Jun 12 8:52
Good day

We are supplying a 30" SCH10 90LRE SA234 WPB taper bored from STDWT to a client. We are a stockist of pipes, fittings and flanges and have been supplying taper bored fittings for many years. It has now become a problem with the client stating that only the manufacturer of the fitting is allowed to perform taper boring due to legal issues.

Is there any substance to this?
moltenmetal (Chemical)
6 Jun 12 8:58
If it's not permitted, you're the not the only people who have been doing this, so you're in good company.
johang (Petroleum)
6 Jun 12 10:10
Indeed, Moltenmetal we perform taper boring for the likes of Chevron and Shell (South Africa), never had any issues.
11echo (Petroleum)
6 Jun 12 19:34
I've done this for a Shell oil project in Calif., they had existing schedule 80 fittings, but by design only need schedule 40 for the project, so we called out tapering boring the fitting to match sch.40 pipe. Only other issue was the boring had to be 4 to 1 taper.
BigInch (Petroleum)
7 Jun 12 1:02
Maybe a requirement from somebody's misguided QA/QC program. No law against it anywhere that I know of.

What would you be doing, if you knew that you could not fail? Ans. Gov lobbyist.

giampi (Mechanical)
7 Jun 12 6:06
It is standard practice to do this both in the stockist yard and in the field during construction. In 38 year of activity as engineer, never i have had this comment from client.
However, the only problem that i can understand could be related to the original certification,that stated different thickness.You can propose to issue additional certification concerning the tapering guaranted the execution according to ASME B31.3.
johang (Petroleum)
7 Jun 12 6:33
Thank you guys, I really appreciate your thoughts on this matter, much appreciated. We will be meeting with the client next week and I will let you know what was decided.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close