Flexible Moment Connection
Flexible Moment Connection
(OP)
The connection detail I posted is being used as a FMC. How would you go about calculating the capcity of this connection to transmit gravity load moments from the beam? I am trying to justify that this connection is flexible enough that it will not transmit more moment than the moment due to seismic loading.






RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
It is a relatively weak moment connection with the ultimate transfer capability defined by the lateral shear of the bolts or deformation in the web at the 4-bolt connection.
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
That is essentially how I determine its capacity to resist the seismic moment. This connection is being used as a FMC. So, it is assumed that this will yield under gravity loading. I am basically trying to justify that it will in fact yield under gravity loads. If it's too rigid, the columns will be underdesigned as they are only designed for the moment due to seismic loading only.
My thinking is that the top of the flat portion of the wing tee (that portion welded to the column) will yield first as it wants to pull away from the column (notice there is no weld along the top). I am looking for a simplified way to analyze that. Thoughts?
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
Once the 3/8" plate yields, how can it transmit any more moment? You say that the maximum moment is 228k-in (W14) and 171k-in (W12). How did you calculate these values?
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
Typically a flexible moment connection will provide angles at the top and bottom flange. Or flange plates (with controlled weld lengths) at the top and bottom. These connections provide flexibility due to the ductility of the connection material. Rotation of the heal of the angle or elongation of the flange plates.
Best professor I ever had, had a simple guide. "If it looks wrong, it probably is"
http://www.FerrellEngineering.com
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
Backcalculate the moment that will be transmitted until component failure occurs and make sure the column can handle it.
We can assume the idealized conditions of pinned or fixed all we want....the actual restraint will dictate how the members respond.
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
www.FerrellEngineering.com
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
Yielding of the connection will cause rotation of the beam end. Once it rotates sufficiently it acts as a simply supported beam and therefore will not transmit any more moment.
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
www.FerrellEngineering.com
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
1) You would know that the connection is not transfering any moment, and all shear is going through the tee part of the connection.
2) You would know that you only have to design your moment plates for live loads in the structure whether they be floor live loads, roof live loads, or seismic live loads. All dead loads are all ready being transfered in simple shear. This helps you in not overstressing the columns. Hopefully your live moments are less than your seismic load moments.
3) You don't need to analyze the tee connection anymore as the moment will be handled by the added on plates.
Assuming you don't have a lot of P-delta issues in your frame analysis you could superimpose the dead load case onto the other cases and see if your columns work as if the connection were traditional moment connection. If that didn't work than you could size the plates or angles just right so that they would qualify as a flexible moment connection.
If by removing dead load moments your column overstressing problem is solved than you could probably get away with just removing the bolts from the seated connection and then replacing them. It would be like releasing the dead load moments from each end one at a time. Friction might prevent this though.
Living in Florida I don't have to deal with the seismic requirements thank God. I honestly don't know how you can make ends meet dealing with all the seismic provisions but that is another story. For me wind is enough. And I'm still not yet comfortable with the whole flexible moment connection idea to be honest. You would really have to do it just right and have really good inspectors in the field. In my practice I either assume its a moment connection or simple shear. Of course this doesn't help you situation out much.
I agree with other comments above also that we never really have a pure simple shear connection unless of course we one bolted everything. I always try to be conservative with my columns. This was a fun question to think about and I'm glad its not my problem. I've gotten to a point though where I'm tired of trying to do physics gymnastics trying to justify things I'm not really sure about. Hence my advice above. Do something that makes this problem simpler and lets you sleep at night.
John Southard, M.S., P.E.
http://www.pdhlibrary.com/
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
Or is the column a HSS?
BA
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
In this case, the prying action of the plate should be avoided with the use of a returned fillet weld along the top (length = 2 W) similar to single angle connections (J2.2b). This will add to the bending stiffness of the connection but should remove the fillet weld as the failure mechanism.
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
This detail has been used in storage platform design often in seismic design categories C or less (R=3). The lateral loads are relatively small. I have reviewed calculations on these mezzanines from several different engineers. It seems that all of the engineers have designed the mezzanines similarly. The beams are designed as simply supported. The columns are designed for axial loads due to gravity loads and moments due to seismic loads. The connection is designed to take the moment due to seismic only; end moments from the beam are never considered. Usually, engineers check the shear capcity of the bolts and/or bolt bearing acting over the moment arm (top of seat connection to center of beam) as the moment capacity. If the connection is capable of transmitting moment due to seismic, logic tells me that it must also be able to transmit moment due to gravity loads. I understand the theory behind the flexible moment connection design, and the key to that working correctly is that the connections yield under gravity load, thus my whole concern of determining when the connection will yield.
Generally these platforms are designed for 125 psf LL, however, they rarely see anything close to this loading. I have never heard of a platform failing, although I'm am sure there are failures out there that we never hear about.
connectegr,
You stated that "AWS/AISC does not permit a one-sided fillet weld in prying." Can you point me to the refrence?
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
www.FerrellEngineering.com
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
A flexible connection should yield at the factored seismic moment so that it cannot carry any more than its design value.
BA
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
www.FerrellEngineering.com
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
A moment on your detail will do two things which are detrimental, and additive. It will flex the flange of the WT in such a way as to cause a bending tensile stress (prying?) across the side fillet welds at their roots, and the magnitude of these tensile stresses will be a max. at the terminations of the side fillet welds. Another location which is prone to weld defects, their terminations. The sum of these two conditions just tends to unzip that fillet weld from the ends of the welds. You could help mitigate the above problems by welding all around on the WT and the seat angle, but this has some drawbacks too. Now the WT has a hard spot at its web and the wall of the HSS will flex w.r.t. the weld root at this point... the same problem as above? Welding around the top corners on the seat angle will as likely as not leave a notch in the top corner of the horiz. leg of the seat angle, a stress raiser right where you don’t want it.
As Ron suggested, 30MAY12, 20:16, however we model it, the joint will take some moment until it starts to yield or fails, how much is another question. And, you must guard against those WT side fillets just unzipping, from the top down. The successful ‘flexible moment connections’ so far, have provided a well defined ‘fuse mechanism’ or yield mechanism and location for this action, away from the welds and pretty much eliminated a weld root or weld hard spot as being a potential failure starter.
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
If anybody gave me that and told me it was a moment connection, I'd toss it directly into File 13 and they'd spend the rest of the year convincing me they didn't really have a MS in computer science.
What would you be doing, if you knew that you could not fail? Ans. Bonds and derivative brokering.
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
What would you be doing, if you knew that you could not fail? Ans. Bonds and derivative brokering.
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
Bending of the WT about its major axis is really not the concern it is more the tension at teh top of the WT associated with the bending, correct?
EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
How would you design a WT connection to take axial load?
RE: Flexible Moment Connection
If you did design the flange for stiffness, you could design for weak axis bending. This would result in a very thick flange. The forces in the weld would be shear and tension, with no rotation at the root of the weld.
Bending at the top is associated with flexibility of a shear connection. Beam end rotation results in a very small degree of rotation. And even less in composite construction. Research has found that these connections are OK with only a weld return at the top. Return should be 2 to 4 times the weld size, but no more than 4 times. Research has also found that welding too much is also detrimental. If a crack is initiated, propagation of the crack with less applied stress.
www.FerrellEngineering.com
RE: Flexible Moment Connection