×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications
2

Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

(OP)
Hello All

We are currently trying to modify the internal couplers on our piping system and one of the solutions is to increase the thickness of the couplers. This will result in a decrease of the pipe OD which will ofcourse have much more effect on the smaller diameters than the larger ones.

If I take the 200 mm pipe for example (ID = 200 mm) what is the maximum reduction that we can make on the joint section so as not to disturb or affect the fluid flow hydraulics. The diameter will return to 200 mm after the joint.

Any help will be much appreciated.

Thanks

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

(OP)
I forgot to mention. the pipes are HDPE pipes

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

Any reduction (or expansion) in pipe size will affect the fluid flow hydraulics.
The question is whether the system will still be adequate for the flow.
There are many ways to analyze the system. For a simple gravity system, try searching wbdg.org for Army Corps methodologies.
If you have an 200mm (8") pipe that is a hundred feet long and reduce the size at one joint by 10%, there is likely no problem hydraulically.
The other issue, which is probably more important, is that if you have a symmetric coupling of a smaller diameter, you are creating a hump in what should be a smooth invert.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

(OP)
Thanks for the reply.

so basically the problem is that sediments could be trapped on the edge of this "hump" if it is large enough. Again, for a 200 mm pipe, what could be this "hump" size that would be just ok?

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

if this is a sanitary sewer, I would not recommend this approach at all.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

There is no acceptable reduction in pipe diameter for a gravity sewer.

The reduction in size would tend to trap debris, silt, grease, etc. This will lead to material building up over time and causing the fouling and clogging of the sewer.

The coupler should be external not internal.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

cvg and bimr are correct as usual.
No reduction in pipe size along the invert is acceptable.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

(OP)
Currently using our joining system, for the 200 mm, the diameter is about 188 mm at the joint and then goes back to 200 after the joint. So this is not suitable for sewer? Also, if only for stormwater, we are looking to make the reduction so that the dia becomes 180 approximately. Any problem with that if it is for stormwater?

Thanks a lot

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

Don't think that any agency or authority that is reviewing your pipe for code compliance will approve it for sewer or stormwater.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

I would not do that for stormwater or sewer unless there was an awful good reason.
You haven't said why you are doing this. External couplings for HDPE are readily available.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

(OP)
Its a corrugated HDPE pipe so we dont have a smooth outer surface for the coupler or buttfusion/electrofusion techniques. The couplers on the inside ace as a bell and spigot type of joint.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

I'm still not getting it. Have you tried ADS? They have corrugated pipe which normally are installed similar to a bell and spigot and they also have couplings for corrugated pipe.
Corrugated HDPE is widely used for stormwater applications (although I don't recommend it) and you shouldn't need an internal coupling.

RE: Acceptable Reduction in Size for Gravity flow sewer and drain applications

Are you using these internal coonectors for all your lines? Why are you using corrugated pipe? I wouldn't use that stuff for sanitary sewers at all. Solid wall HDPE or bell and spigot PVC. if this pipe is aldready in place and leaking, I'd put a CIPP liner in it.

Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources