FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
(OP)
I have learned, heard,experienced that finite element analysis gives only an approximate solution .
Just i need to know that what are all the factors that leads to this approximation??
How can we improve the efficiency of FEA to the highest?
Just i need to know that what are all the factors that leads to this approximation??
How can we improve the efficiency of FEA to the highest?





RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
In fact, FEA is an approximate method of simulation using the computer, but the good part is that everything is in your hand to make your results to be accurate or not. It depends of many factors: accuracy in the material properties used, if loadings & boundary conditions prescribed in your FE model are correct, if meshing approach used is reasonable or not based in the finite elements used in your model, also if the mesh density is coarsed or refined, if the solution type used is reasonable or not, etc.. Please note everything in real life is nonlinear, dynamic & transient, but is up to you to make your assumptions, in your hands is the admissible error of your solution.
In summary, yes, FEA is an approximate method, but is THE method, the best we have today, if your learn to use it in a professional way you will see that is great, impressing ...
Best regards,
Blas.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Blas Molero Hidalgo
Ingeniero Industrial
Director
IBERISA
48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)
WEB: http://www.iberisa.com
Blog de FEMAP & NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
The fact of the matter is that no EXACT solution can be had, even for the abstraction of reality that is your "model." FEA is the closest thing to being a solution that you can possibly have, for all problems beyond the trivial ones.
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Approximations occur at several levels:
a/ mathematical model of the physical problem
b/ discretization
c/ applied loading, boundary conditions, interactions
d/ material model (isotropic/anisotropic .. linear elastic/hyperelastic .. )
e/ analysis (static/dynamic/viscoelastic,..)
f/ perhaps, the least worrisome (in overwhelming majority of cases) numerical approximation
How can we improve the efficiency of FEA to the highest?
I assume you are a beginner, and if so, I would grab a decent book, Bathe's for example, watch his online video lectures on linear finite element analysis first - available on YouTube, solve a bunch of simple problems for which analytical solutions are known.
Best.
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity”
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
"truth ? you can't handle the truth ..."
i'd start with a basic text book on FEA; very quickly you'll see the approximations being made and solutions to minimise the error.
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
(1) Quadrilateral elements, other 2D/3D elements are approximation of the problem and the result depend of the meshing quality and refinement.
(2) For strucural engineer, the 2D/3D beam element is exact at node location (displacement and end forces). Exact means it give the exact same output than by hand calculation of the bernouilli beam solution.
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
"For strucural engineer, the 2D/3D beam element is exact at node location (displacement and end forces). Exact means it give the exact same output than by hand calculation of the bernouilli beam solution. "
Which may be true, but of course, Bernoulli Beam theory is only an approximation to the real world!
http://julianh72.blogspot.com
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Regards,

Qshake
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity”
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Qshake... For sure we use other elements are used to by structural engineeers... see slab & shear wall design, stair design, custom built girder, etc.... What I meant is that beam are generally more used by structural engineer that any other kind of enginner.
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
IR
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity”
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
One of the take home messages, for a beginner or even an intermediate level FEA person, is that: If you are not aware of the assumptions, you are playing with a time bomb.
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
One word... Ignorance !
> the bomb is already exploded... The problem is that you aren't aware of his existance yet !
Read that : http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/the-anosognosics-dilemma-1/
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
> often FE results are not accepted by the FAA until the model is correlated to test data
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
rightly so, there are two many morons out there doing FEA..........it's scary.
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity”
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Certified SolidWorks Professional
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
I would say that there are two types of approximations in FEM analysis.
The first type appies specifically to FEM and it is the difference between FEM and an exact analytical solution. Say that you have a simply supported beam. Most structural engineers would hopefully agree that the midspan moment from a uniform load is M = q L^2 / 8.
That is an analytical exact solution. Similars solutions exist for other structure types. There are analytical solutions for beams, frames, plates etcetera etcetera and those are often the solutions we aim for with our simulations. They are also the solutions that the FEM vendors use for verification purposes.
However, FEM is by definition approximate. For example, the deformations are assumed to be described by the base functions for the element. We make assumptions with the mathematics (weak formulations etc) and hopefully those assumptions are "good enuogh" for the results to be meaningful.
So the approximations are based om a numerical solution of an differential equation. The exact solution is sometimes impossible to find so we test the software with examples that have known solutions. Often these solutions are the analytical solutions.
The second part of approximations are not limited to FEM analysis but applies for all structural analysis. A simply supported beam with a uniform och concentrated load, a concentrated load implies a infinitely small loading area, anybody seen something like that?
Fixed (or free) support conditions don't exist in the real world, everything is flexible to some degree. Material models are usually approximations of reality and so on. Static and linear in a dynamic and nonlinear world means simplifications. And all these simplifications is something that the engineer needs to quantify so the FEM-software can do the number crunshing. FEM can handle huge amounts of data but it has to be told how to handle them.
As for the quality of the final analysis. I would say that the limitations is very seldom in the FEM approximations. FEM is an approximation, yes definitely, but compared to the other approxomations in structural analysis FEM is not the big issue.
Regards
Thomas
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Well, you need two points to make a straight line. Having the two points such as hand calcs and FEA or similar test data and FEA, this will indicate that the FEA is going in the right direction. Also, when I say hand calcs, I’m implying the math and physics of engineering theory using a combination of algebra and calculus not the matrix calculations of each node programmed in FEA. In my opinion, if one do’s not understand the engineering theory and cannot do the hand calcs associated with it, the FEA is almost meaningless.
Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity”
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
Someone models a structure in FEA and gets a result, whether it is frequency or stiffness or whatever. Someone else test the structure in the real world and gets good correlation.
Neither person has had to understand FEA theory.
Neither person has performed a hand calc.
If they successfully do this repeatedly they have demonstrated good FEA modelling techniques.
Oh, and just in case you were wondering, I've been running FEA models for 32 years and testing real world structures for 31 years, and I've never cracked an FEA theory book in my life. And my models correlate, oh yes. Admittedly I am pretty good at hand calcs.
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
I agree - for the most part. The exception is, for example, when you need a material model that is NOT provided in the library of the software package you are using. In such a case you will not only need strong modeling skills but also have a good grasp of FEA theory. User defined elements are an extreme example.
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
I’m not sure where you disagree with me? However, my statement agrees with you and as stated in my last post that if you have past test data (i.e. measured frequency, deflections, G loads…etc) and it correlates to the FEA, then the FEA is going in the right directions and trust worthy. The alternative is if you don’t have past test data, then you will have to do some hand calcs to make sure the FEA is doing what you think it should be doing. But, if a decision has to be made and one only has FEA results and nothing to compare it to is a dangerous road to travel.
A point on FEA results, if person who is deciphering it does not understand engineering theory then it is useless to that person. For example, if the results are in Von Mises stress (or max principle stress) one would have to understand the failure theories to make a determination. If a modal analysis is done and the Fn is found, one would have to understand shock and random vibration theories to come to a conclusion of what the design can handle in stress/deflection and/or damping methods to reduce amplification/transmissibility…and so on.
Also, I tip my hat to you, in the past ten years I do know you have prowess in your engineering skills.
Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity”
RE: FEA gives an approximate solution? Why??
The logical 'and' there implies both are prerequisites, I gave an example where neither need apply yet the results could be superior to those commonly attained. I strongly suspect that of all the FEAs that are run in this world fewer than 10% have any meaningful correlated basis.
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?