×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

(OP)
We have a project which is to construct and additional storage tank for sulfuric acid adjacent to the existing tanks. It has been proposed that the existing transfer pumps be used for the additional tank so as to avoid additional cost. It turned out that the said proposal is plausible because the available NPSH is still greater than the NPSH required by the pump. This calculation is based on the fact that the height of the suction pipeline is constant from the tank to the pump, what will happen if there is a need to construct an overhead piperack for the suction line, and the said piperack is higher than the low-low level of the tank?, what is the static head to be considered, will it still be the low level of the tank (and holding siphoning effect to be valid) or the height of the pipe rack?

-Thanks in advance, hope you understood the situation

RE: NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

The line will get longer, more frictional losses, more fitting losses, and less NPSHA. You also have to know the pressure at the highest, furtherest away point up in the pipe rack. Calculate this "pressure at a point" and see if it will be a subcooled liquid or a boiling liquid. If a boiling liquid or close to boiling, I would advise you seek alternative approaches.

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

You will kick yourself for not putting a booster at the tank.

What would you be doing, if you knew that you could not fail?

RE: NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

What kind of transfer pump is it? Self-priming? Centrifugal? PD? Details?

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

(OP)
Thanks Latexman, the one thing i ignored was taking the pressure at the highest point in the piperack, i will look into that.
By the way, the pump is centrifugal.
BigInch, please elaborate on putting a booster at the tank

RE: NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

Let us know the situation at the high point!

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

I don't consider siphons reliable.

What would you be doing, if you knew that you could not fail?

RE: NPSH and the validity of siphoning effect

BI you are right. I've heard many operators say, "the pump lost prime" when there was no flooded suction.

Good luck,
Latexman

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources