Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Within the first afternoon I found 2 of the 3 needed solutions, and the 3rd came to me over the weekend!..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
bdn2004 (Electrical)
11 May 12 11:30
We are installing a new maintanenace transformer that will be fed from 4 different 15kV circuits.
Only one circuit at a time will ever power this transformer. Most of the existing feeders to the existing transformers are fed with aluminum pipe. And that is what we want to do here. The circuits are 15kV phase to phase.

I'm looking at the NEC Table 490.24 that indicates to to get a BIL of 110kV, we need at least 10.5 inches between the phases and 10 inches to a grounded surface.

It's been suggested a couple of different configurations. One would give us more space but would involve bringing one of the phases underneath the other two, and not exactly an equal distance away from the other phases. It seems there may be some type design flaw we aren't thinking of? Is there some kind of transformer action this would cause?

I sketched this out to make what I'm speaking of much clearer...but I can't figure out how to make an attachment with the new "Start a New Thread" input screen. Anyone know how to do this?

bdn2004 (Electrical)
14 May 12 14:38
Here is the sketch I made for the original question. There are three sheets. Two options and a picture.
PhiberOptik (Electrical)
15 May 12 23:53
The main (possible) problem I see with this arrangement is with any 1 switch closed the other 3 switches will have hot knife blades.
BJC (Electrical)
16 May 12 1:51
Looks like your building a switchyard not "some equipment over 600 volts".
I would at least look at the NESC.
Check out the BurRec substaion manual- it's good and it free.
bdn2004 (Electrical)
17 May 12 16:17
The other 3 switches are hot, but it's like this on all of the other similar installations at the plant. The similar installations have worked with no issues for many decades. The switches are 30' up in the air.

I did improve the design some by reversing the phase sequence on one pair of the switches. See the attached.
stevenal (Electrical)
18 May 12 11:12
I don't like the last one with its inconsistent phasing. Might cause confusion in the future. Hot blades is always a possibility with this type of switch. Make sure you have phase to phase clearance from open blade to nearby bus.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close