×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Retained Backfill Replacement for Conventional Gravity Walls

Retained Backfill Replacement for Conventional Gravity Walls

Retained Backfill Replacement for Conventional Gravity Walls

(OP)
The overall idea is to increase the height or stability of a conventional gravity wall where there is bad or even 'ok' sandy/clayey site soils behind the wall. Essentially the drainage aggregate or some type of granular material is placed behind the wall and sloped upward at approx a 1:1 to encompass the failure plane. Then the wall is evaluated using the soil properties of the granular material for computing the lateral pressures on the retaining wall (see attached).  

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Retained Backfill Replacement for Conventional Gravity Walls

Why was a 1:1 plane selected for the failure wedge? It is not clear what the goal is? Do you want to increase the height? How much?

After the new backfill is placed the wall will need to move to engage the friction in the backfill. Is it designed for at rest of active earch pressure? How much movement is acceptable?

Are there other issues: surcharge, scour, hydrostatic pressure? Are you using an friction or passive resistance at the base?

RE: Retained Backfill Replacement for Conventional Gravity Walls

RFreund, you really did not ask a question. However, what you described and showed in your attachment is not unusual. Sloping back the less competent, original soil and then backfilling the wall with more competent soil will give a more economical wall design and better performance. The same idea is used when a retaining wall is backfilled with Styrofoam (or equal) against the properly sloped original, less competent soil. Sufficient sloping of the less competent soil eliminates its high earth pressure so that the wall is designed for the lower pressure of the better soil. While a 1:1 slope may encompass the failure plane of the more competent soil, the slope of the less competent, original soil should be flat enough that its slope is stable with a satisfactory safety factor. Then, the better backfill can be placed.

If you are trying to increase the height of an existing retaining wall, replacing the less competent soil behind the wall can certainly help.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Retained Backfill Replacement for Conventional Gravity Walls

(OP)
Thanks for the responses. Somehow my second paragraph was left off. I just wanted to get some feed back on the concept. PEinc _ You answered most of my questions / concerns. The more i thought about it the 1:1 was zort of arbitrary and what u saidmakes sense. The goal is to achieve taller wall ht wifhout using geogrid.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Retained Backfill Replacement for Conventional Gravity Walls

(OP)
Yikes, sorry last post was from my phone.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources