×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CMAA #70 Transverse Web Stiffener Sizing

CMAA #70 Transverse Web Stiffener Sizing

CMAA #70 Transverse Web Stiffener Sizing

(OP)
Here is a tough question for our crane design experts.  The first few paragraphs are only background.  The only question I have is at the end and it is specific to sizing the web stiffeners.  I'd prefer not to make this into a complete lesson on design per CMAA #70.

I have a design for a 440 Ton Gantry crane with box girders 9'Hx3'W.  It has fixed lifting points so there is no trolley.  It's fixed lift points are at about the quarter points of the 100 ft span.  It doesn't have full or half height diaphrams because there is no trolley and this works per all the CMAA #70 requirements.  It does need transverse web stiffeners for web shear buckling according to 4.5.4.1 with a required spacing of 96".  The designer was conservative and put the stiffeners at 60" oc.  The problem comes in sizing the stiffeners per 3.5.4.3.

The stiffener sizing equation is
I>1.2*(h^3)*(t^3)/(a^2)
where h=Web height (108")
  t= web thickness (3/4")
  a= spacing of transverse stiffeners (actual?)
  I= Minimum Moment of Inertia of the stiffener plate about the interface of the web plate.  (i.e I=b*(h^3)/3 for rectangular bar)

All previous editions of CMAA #70 had this same equation but were very specific that the "a" to be used was the calculated maximum spacing not actual spacing if different.  In the current 2010 edition it has been changed to read just "spacing of stiffeners". Many the equations for determining stiffener spacing were modified or added in the 2010 edition.  I have looked and no errata has been issued for this edition.  

So for this case if I space the stiffeners 96" as calculated
I=69 in^4 so I can use a 3/4"x7" flatbar

If I use the actual spacing as currently written in CMAA #70
I=177 in^4 so I would need a 3/4"x10" flatbar

Why would putting the web stiffeners closer together than required for web shear buckling require a much bigger stiffener?

I told you I had a hard question!  I'm also going to ask CMAA but their process can be slow.

RE: CMAA #70 Transverse Web Stiffener Sizing

I'm not familiar with the CMAA equations, but maybe this will help.  At a larger stiffener spacing, it takes less load to buckle the web, so the demand at the stiffener would be less.  This would give you a smaller stiffener.  At a smaller stiffener spacing, it takes more load to buckle the web, so there would be more demand at the stiffener.  This would give you a larger stiffener.

That is, maybe the stiffener size equation is calculating the size necessary to prevent web buckling under any load, not the size necessary to prevent web buckling under the actual load.  You'll note that the applied load doesn't appear in the equation for the stiffener moment of inertia.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources