×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API 650 Figure E-1 (Ci Coefficient)

API 650 Figure E-1 (Ci Coefficient)

API 650 Figure E-1 (Ci Coefficient)

(OP)
I am working on a tank calculation for FRP vessels and using API 650 as a guide to develop the sloshing calculations.  The graph provided in Figure E-1 (Ci coefficient) seems to limit out at 1.5 (H/D) ratio.  Has anyone out there had experience in what to do when the magical 1.5 H/D ratio is exceeded?
Much obliged!

RE: API 650 Figure E-1 (Ci Coefficient)

For a "normal" tank, the tank shell is assumed to be rigid, contents are assumed to slosh, and calculations made accordingly.

If desired, calculations can be made assuming the shell is not rigid, and in that case, Fig. E-1 can be used to calculate the fundamental period of the tank shell.  I believe Figure E-1 is based on a steel tank, and is an approximation made by evaluating Veletsos' method over a range of parameters, and that method could be used directly instead of using the Ci graph (be aware that it's kind of a mess).  This would normally be applicable for either very large tanks or tanks in very high seismic loading, where the extra analysis is worthwhile.

For a (presumably) small FRP tank, I would use the standard method and skip the Ci calculation altogether.

For larger tanks, the consideration of sloshing results in additional freeboard required, but a decrease in overturning moment.  ASCE 7 allows you to consider small tanks as entirely rigid, which would be another approach to look into.

RE: API 650 Figure E-1 (Ci Coefficient)

(OP)
Thank you very much for the quick reply.  Unfortunately, our tanks have can range from 10' diameter x 60' tall to 100' diameter x 75' tall.  We make a number of smaller "shop fabricated" tanks too but I am attempting to write this calculation to cover all aspect ratios.  I will look into Veletsos' method, but am afraid that a rigid assumption would not be appropriate for most of what we build.
Much obliged!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources