×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flame Sprayed Tungsten Carbide coating

Flame Sprayed Tungsten Carbide coating

Flame Sprayed Tungsten Carbide coating

(OP)
I have an application in which we used a flame sprayed tungsten carbide coating on a rod under a reciprocating o-ring seal.  The coating was polished to a 16 rms (or better) finish.  Now, there is a leak past the o-ring.  The fluid is a water based hydraulic fluid.  However, it also leaks using nitrogen.  All our testing seems to indicate that the leaking is occuring through a porosity in the coating and not past the o-ring seal surface.  Has anyone ever heard of sprayed and polished tungsten carbide exibiting this kind of porosity?

RE: Flame Sprayed Tungsten Carbide coating

The following is from ASM HANDBOOK Volume 5 Surface Engineering:

Thermal spray coatings consist of many layers of thin, overlapping, essentially lamellar particles, frequently called splats.  Generally, the higher particle-velocity coating processes produce the densest and beter bonded coatings, both cohesively (splat-to-splat) and adhesively )coating-to-substrate).  Metallographically estimated porosities for detonation gun coatings and some HVOF (High Velocity Oxy Fuel) coatings are less than 2%, whereas most plasma sprayed coating porosities are in the range of 5 to 15%.  The porosities of flame sprayed coatings may exceed 15 %.

So, it is very well known that thermal spray coatings can exhibit substantial porosity.  You should consult with your vendor to determine the following:

a) how much porosity is present?
b) how much porosity is tolerable?
c) can they produce the coating to that requirement?

RE: Flame Sprayed Tungsten Carbide coating

I have used HVOF tungsten carbide Metco powders on hundreds of shaft overhauls with zero defects.  Recommend changing to the HVOF process (see post above) to decrease the porosity.  Proper preparation of the shaft is as important to sealing performance as the selection of the seal itself. Conditions that affect the seal are the shaft configuration, tolerance, hardness, materials, speed and eccentricity.


Recommended shaft finish is 10-20 micro-inches Ra (arithmetic average), plunge ground , with a machine lead angle of zero ±3 minutes and a burr-free chamfer or radius.  The chamfer acts as a ramp for the sealing lip to ride up on. Without it, it is virtually impossible to install the seal without damaging the lip.

I hope you find this usefull!  Cheers

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources