×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.
2

Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

(OP)
Hello,  I am trying to model a bridge replacement case, where the proposed bridge has a larger opening (3-sided culvert), and a parapet wall thats 3' tall.  This is causing my WSEL upstream to rise in comparision to the existing.  I have modelled the parapet as a deck with the high chord corressponding to the top of the parapet elevation.

Is there an alternate way of modelling the parapet, without having the model assume that the entire width (length when we speak hydraulically) of the bridge is at the same elevation as the parapet.  Please advise.

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

macgarth - wouldnt the approaching flow have to reach the minimum elevation of the parapet before overtopping the bridge; hence creating a backwater condition?  If not, is your bridge perched or can flow cross the road outside of the parapet/bridge; is this configuration represented in the highchord?

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

(OP)
Thanks Gbam . The road outside of the bridge is such that the flow can cross the road outside the parapet, and this is represented in the high chord.

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

If I understand correctly, you've used high chord and low chord deck data to establish your roadway profile?  Or in other words, looking at the bridge editor, there is a jump in the top of road profile at the beginning and end of the bridge (to represent the top of wall) and the profile approaching and leaving the bridge is at normal or proposed grade?

If that's the case, I think that is probably the best way to model it.  If your existing roadway is overtopping and you are placing a solid wall/rail in the flow area, it could be likely that you are reducing weir flow and creating a rise in WSEL.

Unrelated...It would be nice if HEC would throw in an option to model slots or "windows" such as those used in decorative bridge railings.

Good luck!

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

(OP)
Thanks Froude.  Your understanding of my model setup is correct.  The proposed culvert opening is larger than the existing, and the bridge is replaced in kind.  The parapet wall is reducing the weir flow. So what do you think are my options to get back the WSEL back to existing.  I am already at the max culvert opening possible for the proposed bridge height.

Also, I am running the bridge comps under Energy Eqn.  Any suggestions.

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

Tell the architect to nix the parapet? ponytails

Seriously, though, I had this issue on an in-kind replacement too - only they shifted the bridge 400 ft upstream and I had the same backwater elevation to meet. I guess your options are:
- longer sag curve to extend your weir flow area
- change to a box culvert
- add a secondary culvert on the overbank(s)

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

(OP)
thanks guys for your responses.

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

One thing you should evaluate is if the overflow area outside of the prapet is indeed weir flow.  I have had models with perched bridges but low areas were outside of the bridge abutments.  In these cases I used the multiple opening option to model these areas as conveyances.  If the bridge does overtop, As Fransesca suggests, try to eliminate the parapet and replace with open railing.  

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

Pressure flow option is definitely worth a look if it's justifiable, which it sounds like it may be.  Depending on how much conveyance you've blocked, the pressure flow scenario could still show a rise.

It really sounds like you need more bridge opening or potentially lower/change your railing.  Your DOT may have approved bridge railings with enough openings that you may be able to increase conveyance.

What is your tailwater condition like?  Will downstream grading help your case at all?  Depending on your environmental regulations/impacts, lowering the flowline could be an option, if grades allow.

RE: Hec Ras - Modelling Bridge Parapet.

(OP)
Thanks Guys,  I am trying to go with open railing and it seems to help.  Thanks for all our help.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources