Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Just to let you know...what a great site you have. I posted a pretty generic question yesterday and have had 8 responses already, anyway thanks again and keep up the good work..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
brimstoner (Materials)
30 Apr 12 14:04
I frequently encounter Charpy impact energy reported as J/cm**2.  I assume this is based on the fracture area and not the overall area of the test specimen.  I am attempting to normalize data from '2.5t' specimens to a result for a full size specimen (10 x 10 mm, with 2 mm notch depth, leaving 0.8 cm fracture area).  Again I am guessing '2.5t' indicates a 2.5 mm thick specimen.  
Someone please clarify!  

Note this is not a question about test temperature compensation (as in ASME VIII-1, UG-84).   
brimstoner (Materials)
30 Apr 12 14:22
I think what I am actually asking is:

how is J(ft-lbf) related to J/cm**2 (ft-lbf/sq.in.) for standard and subsize Charpy specimens?   
Helpful Member!(2)  ulyssess (Materials)
1 May 12 8:40
J/cm**2 is related to the nominal cross section below the notch.
Charpy-V: value in J/cm**2 = value in J divided  by 0.8
27 J = 34 J/cm^2
Charpy-U: value in J/cm**2 = value in J divided  by 0.5
These relations are valid for all specimen (standard or reduced-size section).
The indication in J/cm^2 or ft-lbs/sq.in. is not in conformance with actual standards like ISO 148-1 or ASTM A370.


 
brimstoner (Materials)
1 May 12 10:13
Thanks ulyssess, you've confirmed my suspicion that J/cm**2 is non-standard.  I found no reference to that in ASTM A370 and other documents.  
 

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close