×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

bolt inspection

bolt inspection

bolt inspection

(OP)
Dear All,

What standard should we use if we want re-use a bolt ?

 

RE: bolt inspection

When in doubt, throw it out.

RE: bolt inspection

(OP)
LOL, when we doubt it, how we determine it can be used again or not ? the parameter ?

RE: bolt inspection

Here are a couple things you can do.

A simple test for deformation would to measure thread pitch over the entire length of the bolt to determine if it has permanently deformed. e.g. a 8 tpi thread pitch should measure 48 threads over 6 inches.

A more complicated method is to look for internal cracks/flaws with an ultrasonic device.

RE: bolt inspection

You have said nothing about the application of the bolts and whether or not they needed to be pretorqued.  I have seen a terrible accident from bolts that were repeatedly hand tightened over the years of operation and ultimately failing with serious consequences to the operator. So DLite30 first comment is highly appropriate.

RE: bolt inspection

(OP)
no standard ? ASME or API codes ?

RE: bolt inspection

Consider the application. If the connections are highly critical or could cause injury or worse if they fail, toss them and buy new ones.

Start by confirmming that bolt/stud is OEM, and not a counterfeit.  This means acquiring the original paperwork for the stud/bolt.  If you can't confirm this...disgard.

If you can confirm the stud is OEM, visually inspect the bolt for signs of wear/corrosion. Toss if the corrosion has reduced the shank CSA to any visually appreciable amount.

Follow DLiteE30's recommendations above for stud measurement

Perform straight beam ultrasonics on the studs.  Discard if any indications >10%FSH are found.  Note:  Seek out a good Level III technician as the bolt configuration may be such that a poorly experienced technician cannot differentiate geometric configurations from cracking.  Test from both ends; you may have to grind one or both ends flat for good contact.  

Consider wet fluorescent MPI if the condition of the bolt/stud is conducive to the test.


The links also provide good information:

http://boltcouncil.org/files/2009RCSCSpecification.pdf

http://www.wellheadservices.net/Technical.htm






 





 

RE: bolt inspection

I'd support what's SectionIX is suggesting, adding the possibility of performing submerged PT.

RE: bolt inspection

I would avoid PT as a greater level of cleanliness is required than for MPI.  Its generally difficult to remove enough PT from the threads, and overcleaning will probably occur.

Having said that, if you want to try PT, avoid the solvent removable method as there is too much drama involved with the cleaning process (this is the same liguid found in dye packs used in banks).

At the end of the day, MPI is a superior method for this application, and coupled with straigh beam ultrasonics, will provide the best detection of cracking.

One final note, a variant of phased array ultrasonics would provide the highest level of detection, but would be cost prohibitive--by the time you get the calibration standards (effectively the same studs you will be testing) and perform the test, the cost to replace the studs will be less than the testing involved.  And, after all that, you still have used studs that will probably not last as long as you want them to...


 

RE: bolt inspection

I don't recommend dye penetration NDE be considered in this application: Since the highest stresses (most likely fail points) are at the smallest bolt/stud cross-section, the highest stresses are at the root of the thread, not the smooth shaft of the bolt/stud.

You can't adequately clean the thread's root of a used bolt, but can only (realistically anyway) clean the smooth shaft.  So the dye pen test will only show "good metal" where the stress is least.  You'll always get dye pen residue (implying a crack) just where you want to look.  

An NDE person's time (travel plus wages, plus cleaning time of each bolt) is worth more than dozens of new studs.    

RE: bolt inspection

Easiest way to evaluate unacceptable 'stretch' is to get a 'good*' nut and see if it will screw smoothly onto each stud, using just a couple of fingers.

* good = a nut that fits snugly onto the used studs.  There is a LOT of difference in the closeness of stud-to-nut fit from mfr to mfr, and lot to lot.  And they are all within industry tolerances.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources