×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CMU questions

CMU questions

CMU questions

(OP)
I have (2) questions regarding CMU...

1.  What is the best way to attach WF beams to the FACE of a CMU stair shaft wall?  I was considering a cast-in-place concrete beam with embed plates built in the plane of the CMU wall, and attaching the WF to the embed plates with a standard full depth connection.

2.  In the same building, I have a 50' tall 12" CMU wall with no return walls.  The wall spans vertically about 16'-18' from floor to floor.  Are masonry anchors attached to steel framing considered sufficient to brace the wall?  Or do I need to attach the CMU wall to the steel framing with a more secure connection such as a Hilti anchor?

Thanks

RE: CMU questions

1. Depending on the magnitude of the loads, if it is light roof framing I would face fix a plate with hilti anchors to the wall (corefilled and reinforced) and cleat from that. More substantial loading such as floor loading I would provide a blockout in the wall and bear the WF on the CMU.

2. If the connection requires any significant fire-rating than I would provide mechanical hilti anchors.

RE: CMU questions

(OP)
asixth, thanks for the response.

1.  I wanted to give the contractor the flexibility to build the entire CMU wall shaft prior to erecting the steel.  Therefore I do not want to provide a blockout in the wall.  Another structural engineer on the job has recommended the cast-in-place beam option.  I have never done this before, so I wanted to get a second opinion.  Do you see any issues with that approach?

2.  The connection does not require any fire-rating.  The wall was originally intended to be a metal stud wall, but I asked for it to be CMU because I need it for a shear wall.  Do the masonry anchors alone brace the wall at each floor?

RE: CMU questions

To me forming a pocket in a beam is very easy for a mason and still allows the wall to be built without waiting for the beam installation (assuming the beam doesn't brace the wall)

Plus you avoid the eccentric load on the wall when attaching to the face of the wall.

 

RE: CMU questions

1. (a) Agree with asixth. But rather than using a wall-plate, I would suggest all-bolted-seated connection using an angle. The angle could be fastened to masonry wall using drilled-in anchors and the beam fastened to angle using bolts. (b) Regardless of the magnitude of the loads, I prefer structural members bearing directly on the masonry. Assuming 8" thick wall, I would provide a partial block-out on the wall, a minimum of 4" in width. That leaves 3 5/8" for masonry which would provide about 2 hours of FRR to the beam sides. The bearing plate may be shop welded to the beam and fastened to the wall using off-center drilled-in anchors to get the required edge distance. Masonry can then be built around the block out.  
2. Per ACI 530-05: Connectors shall be designed to transfer horizontal design forces acting either perpendicular or parallel to the wall, but not less than 200 lbs per lineal foot. The maximum spacing between connectors shall be 4 feet. To avoid closely spaced connectors, you can always provide a masonry beam on top of the wall which can span horizontally greater distances.   

RE: CMU questions

(OP)
Everyone,
Thank you for the responses.  I think these are all good solutions.  If in fact I still go with the cast-in-place beam built within the plane of the wall (primarily because another engineer prefers that method), do you believe that is acceptable?  We would run continuous vertical bars from the CMU wall below, through the conrete beam at the floor, and into the CMU wall above.

Again, I have always used a solution similar to what you have all suggested, but in this instance I am curious if the concrete beam option would pose any unforseeable problems.

RE: CMU questions

Of course, the concrete beam is acceptable. But why bring in another trade when things can be managed with masonry.

RE: CMU questions

Agree with the comments above.
As far as bracing the wall with the steel beam connection. You may need a continuous horizontal bond beam spanning between steel beams depending on the spacing of the steel beams. The wall would span vertically to this bond beam.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources