×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NACE mr0175 interpretation

NACE mr0175 interpretation

NACE mr0175 interpretation

(OP)
According to mr0175 alloy steel with more than 1% nickel is not allowed even if hardness is less than 22 HRC. This would rule out using 4340 steel in our H2S environment. We were wanting to use quenched and tempered 4340 instead of 4140 for a large compressor forging to get better through hardening. Am I correct that 4340 is not allowed, and if so can you explain why that is? sta67

RE: NACE mr0175 interpretation

(OP)
Thanks SJones for your response. I looked up the latest ISO 15156-2 that you referred to but that section you referenced simply tells me that I can either test for acceptance, or petition based on historical use. Further down in the standard it still says the same thing, that alloy steel greater than 1% Ni is not allowed (without the history). So my question still stands, and that is, why is 4340 with Ni content not allowed when 4140 is? What does the nickel do to the microstructure that makes it suspect in H2S? sta67

RE: NACE mr0175 interpretation

I am not a member of the committee that developed this standard. Nickel does two things to ferrous-based materials - it increases ferrite strength, increases hardenability and toughness. The increase in toughness is good.
 
Increased hardenability and increased ferrite strength will result in increased hardness of weld heat affected zones in base material containing over 1% nickel. This plays a significant role in trying to keep hardness below a threshold to avoid SCC in service.
 

RE: NACE mr0175 interpretation

It's not a question of 'allowed'; it's a question of qualification and whether the material can be considered to be 'automatically qualified.'  You are free to qualify the material as directed in the  referenced paragraphs.

MR0175 is, essentially, an empirical standard.  The restriction on nickel was based on observed failures in materials with nickel content greater than this value.  No doubt, a healthy margin was shaved off to arrive at the 1 mass % threshold.

NACE Publication 8X294 has this to say:

"For many years controversy has existed concerning nickel content of the steel to the extent that NACE Standard MR0175 limited nickel content to a maximum of 1%.  Several investigations suggested that the effect of nickel is related to the potential resultant microstructure (i.e., retained austenite that transforms to untempered martensite) and its high susceptibility to SSC."

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources