×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Chilled water - Air handler

Chilled water - Air handler

Chilled water - Air handler

(OP)
What are the relative plusses and minuses of these 2 control methods within an air hanlder, considering both temperature and humidity control?

a.) Constant airflow through chilled water coil and varying chilled water flow.

or

b.) Coil bypass dampers and constant chilled water flow.

RE: Chilled water - Air handler

butelja, I believe that discharge temperature and humidity can be accurately controlled using either method, assuming a well-tuned BAS (with well-placed sensing devices) operates either the damper or valve, but I prefer Option A. The reason is that if you had a plant full of air handling units that vary bypass air flow versus chilled water flow, you lose on the opportunity to save in chilled water pumping costs. During low-load seasons, for example, a central plant serving a system full of Option B AHUs would still pump full flow even though it may require only 30% of the cooling capacity.

If you think back to thermo basics (Q = m * Cp * dT), the Q, or energy required from the load, will be constant [lower water flow-(m), higher dT, higher flow, lower dT, therefore constant Q] but the difference remains in the pumping losses at the motor (minor), mechanical pump losses(medium), and system friction (major).

I have no concrete evidence, but I think that excess energy losses from Option B would be the deciding factor.

Best of luck, -CB

RE: Chilled water - Air handler

Agrees with CB! Energy is a prime factor in decision making. I have some personal reservations regarding air bypass damper system. (That system put me in trouble even with dehumidifiers) Some controls we used were of Landis&Stefa, Honeywell and Sekonic.

Regards,

RE: Chilled water - Air handler

I agree, Quark, and add the following to your point -

Minor damper modulation could cause major swings in air volume changes in either direction, through or around the coil. The standard air volume control is basically by butterfly valve (i.e., damper), where chilled water flow technology is much more refined with different types of valves, such as globe/needle valves with excellent throttling characteristics. A 5% change in position command from a BAS for an air damper might mean a 40% change in air flow, whereas throttling linearity with a typical coil control valve is much better.

In addition, chilled water flow changes are much less likely to produce the type of immediate and drastic changes in outlet conditions resulting from air volume modulation. With CHW flow control versus air volume control, you are basically "steering the ship" with a control parameter that does not dramatically change the ship's course with minor steering wheel movement.

(If that makes sense!). -CB

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources