×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Existing Mezzanine Rating

Existing Mezzanine Rating

Existing Mezzanine Rating

(OP)
I have been asked to provide a live load rating in psf of existing mezzanines in a manufacturing facility, I assume for insurance purposes.  ASCE 11.1.2 says "Existing structures and alterations to existing structures need only comply with the seismic requirements of this standard where requried by Appendix 11B."
I believe the client is only looking for vertical loading rating, but not sure this is the only consideration that should be incorporated - i.e. seismic considerations.
Thoughts of whether seismic forces should be used in the evaluation of the ratings?

RE: Existing Mezzanine Rating

You have two compelling tasks to perform here:

1.  Meet the expectations of the client in terms of their need to satisfy their insurance company - i.e. gravity check to post live load capacities.  

2.  As an engineer - protect public safety and welfare and if you suspect there is no complete lateral load path for the mezzanine - inform them separately in a letter that you suspect (you don't positively know for sure) that there may be a problem with the lateral stability of the mezzanine and that you would recommend that they have it investigated further either by you or any competent structural engineer.

 

RE: Existing Mezzanine Rating

I absolutely agree with JAE.  But would add, that your compelling tasks include; don't make assumptions in cases like this, talk with the client and find out exactly what they need and explain JAE's two comments to them in detail.  'We want to know what it'll carry' is what they would ask you, they don't know any better, but you should.  You can't ignore the possibility of lateral loads if they are likely, and they can't afford to B.S. their insurance company if they expect coverage.  The insurance company wants to know what they'll be insuring against, not what will this mezz. carry under ideal conditions.  I would assume that the intent of the code is to say that you don't have to redesign or rebuild the entire building if it meet code, when built; but you do have an obligation to inform the client of the real situation as it relates to today's standards and codes.  And, furthermore this mezz. is, in effect, a separate structure, maybe braced by the building, and the insurance company may insist that it meet current codes to be insured.  They will likely find any deficiency if/when asked to cover a claim, and your explaining then is no fun and is ruinous to your reputation.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources